2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e00946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical approach to predict the flexural damage behavior of pervious concrete

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In equation ( 4), ℓ represents a regularized length that describes the thickness of the smeared crack and is also an internal parameter affecting the critical stress for crack initiation. In equation ( 5), elastic strain is decomposed into extensive ε + and compressive ε − parts (for further details, refer to the formulas in Nguyen et al [23,24]). Applying the principle of maximum dissipation and energy minimization to equation ( 2) yields the set of coupled equations to be solved in the domain Ω associated with the structure, with boundary ∂Ω and outward normal n, to determine d (x) and u (x), for all positions denoted by the vector x in Ω:…”
Section: Fundamental Concept Of the Phase Field Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In equation ( 4), ℓ represents a regularized length that describes the thickness of the smeared crack and is also an internal parameter affecting the critical stress for crack initiation. In equation ( 5), elastic strain is decomposed into extensive ε + and compressive ε − parts (for further details, refer to the formulas in Nguyen et al [23,24]). Applying the principle of maximum dissipation and energy minimization to equation ( 2) yields the set of coupled equations to be solved in the domain Ω associated with the structure, with boundary ∂Ω and outward normal n, to determine d (x) and u (x), for all positions denoted by the vector x in Ω:…”
Section: Fundamental Concept Of the Phase Field Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, when changes occur in actual engineering conditions, extensive laboratory tests are required to re-evaluate the hydromechanical properties of materials, causing significant financial and labor investments. In light of this deficiency, a variety of alternative methods have been employed to evaluate the mechanical strength and infiltration properties of pervious concrete, including the random lattice discrete particle method 37 , discrete element method (DEM) [38][39][40] , finite element method (FEM) 41,42 , computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method 43 , and other self-developed numerical simulation methods [44][45][46] . The aim of these methods is to reduce the expenses associated with laboratory tests and expedite the material design process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%