2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10915-019-01029-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Approximations for the Tempered Fractional Laplacian: Error Analysis and Applications

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This operator was used to develop finite difference schemes to solve the tempered fractional Laplacian equation that governs the probability distribution function of the positions of particles. Similarly, Duo et al [31] presented a finite difference method to discretize the d-dimensional (for d ≥ 1) tempered integral fractional Laplacian (−∆ + λ) α/2 . By means of this approximation they resolved fractional Poisson problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This operator was used to develop finite difference schemes to solve the tempered fractional Laplacian equation that governs the probability distribution function of the positions of particles. Similarly, Duo et al [31] presented a finite difference method to discretize the d-dimensional (for d ≥ 1) tempered integral fractional Laplacian (−∆ + λ) α/2 . By means of this approximation they resolved fractional Poisson problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This operator was used to develop finite difference schemes to solve the tempered fractional Laplacian equation that governs the probability distribution function of the positions of particles. Similarly, Duo et al [30] presented a finite difference method to discretize the d-dimensional (for d ≥ 1) tempered integral fractional Laplacian (−∆ + λ) α/2 . By means of this approximation they resolved fractional Poisson problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the integral definition in (3) provides a pointwise formulation and thus can easily work with different boundary conditions. Based on the integral definition, finite difference methods [15,10,14] and finite element methods [2,1,7,4] have been developed to discretize the fractional Laplacian (−∆) α 2 with extended Dirichlet boundary conditions. In contrast to the pseudo-differential definition, the integral definition in (3) is valid only for α ∈ (0, 2), so do the resulting numerical methods [15,10,14,2,1,7,4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the integral definition, finite difference methods [15,10,14] and finite element methods [2,1,7,4] have been developed to discretize the fractional Laplacian (−∆) α 2 with extended Dirichlet boundary conditions. In contrast to the pseudo-differential definition, the integral definition in (3) is valid only for α ∈ (0, 2), so do the resulting numerical methods [15,10,14,2,1,7,4]. Moreover, the above methods based on the integral definition are mainly limited to the second order accuracy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%