2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40430-016-0615-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical generation of road profile through spectral description for simulation of vehicle suspension

Abstract: and its successive differentiations without going through the numerical differentiation to avoid the numerical errors. It is shown that the method of superposition of harmonics is a flexible and powerful technique for generating the Gaussian random signal from spectral description as it can handle any practical shape of spectral density not only continuous but discrete split spectrum also. In addition, the use of higher sampling frequency has negligible effect on the contribution of high frequency spectral eit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(b). The differential equation in time domain can be formulated as żr()t=2πf0Vzr()t+n02πGq()n0V0.25emWn()t where W n ( t ) is white noise with 0 mean value and 0.1 intensity power spectrum density, f 0 is the low cut‐off frequency with value of 0.11 m ‐1 , n 0 is the reference spatial frequency with value of 0.1 m ‐1 , and G q ( n 0 ) = 256 × 10 −6 m 3 denotes the road roughness coefficient. For the convenience of comparison, the forward velocity V = 15 m/s is chosen . To compare the simulation results with the other pertinent references, superposition of multi‐nonlinear functions with different frequency are chosen, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(b). The differential equation in time domain can be formulated as żr()t=2πf0Vzr()t+n02πGq()n0V0.25emWn()t where W n ( t ) is white noise with 0 mean value and 0.1 intensity power spectrum density, f 0 is the low cut‐off frequency with value of 0.11 m ‐1 , n 0 is the reference spatial frequency with value of 0.1 m ‐1 , and G q ( n 0 ) = 256 × 10 −6 m 3 denotes the road roughness coefficient. For the convenience of comparison, the forward velocity V = 15 m/s is chosen . To compare the simulation results with the other pertinent references, superposition of multi‐nonlinear functions with different frequency are chosen, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the spatial frequency scope of n 1 < n < n 2 , the power spectrum density of bridge deck roughness is G q n . Based on a frequency spectrum 3 Complexity spreading form of the steady random process, the variance σ 2 q of the bridge deck roughness could be expressed by [17][18][19][20][21]…”
Section: Vibration Responses Of Long-span Bridgesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where σ 2 is the pavement profile variance, v is the vehicle velocity, while α is a constant that depends on the type of pavement surface, it is recommended to use following α values (Dharankar, Hada, & Chandel, 2016;Tyan et al, 2009). …”
Section: Shaping Filter Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%