2009
DOI: 10.1016/s1570-8659(08)00206-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Generation of Stochastic Differential Equations in Climate Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The (N1) SDE can be simulated using numerical methods for Stratonovich SDEs (e.g., Ewald and Penland 2009), but the derivatives associated with these methods may be costly to compute in high-dimensional models (as at each step the diffusion s would need to be computed not just at the present climate state but at neighboring states). These models form a hierarchy from the least accurate (A) model to the (in principle) most accurate (N1) model, which best accounts for the climate-weather interactions.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The (N1) SDE can be simulated using numerical methods for Stratonovich SDEs (e.g., Ewald and Penland 2009), but the derivatives associated with these methods may be costly to compute in high-dimensional models (as at each step the diffusion s would need to be computed not just at the present climate state but at neighboring states). These models form a hierarchy from the least accurate (A) model to the (in principle) most accurate (N1) model, which best accounts for the climate-weather interactions.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the transformation from one description to the other can be prohibitively difficult in physical applications. For longer discussions on the difference between Itô and Stratonovich systems, we refer the reader to Arnold (1974), Horsthemke & Lefever (1984), Kloeden & Platen (1992) and Ewald & Penland (2008). The important message here is for when one wishes to approximate a continuous real system with short but finite correlation time in a general circulation model (GCM) with a Gaussian stochastic variable.…”
Section: (C ) the Central Limit Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kloeden & Platen 1992), enormous tomes on the theory and practice of numerically integrating SDEs. A review of some of these techniques, including longer discussions of the schemes we present here, may be found in Ewald & Penland (2008). In this subsection, we confine ourselves to discussing the procedure and results of using an explicit stochastic Euler scheme (Rümelin 1982), an explicit stochastic Heun scheme (Rümelin 1982) and an implicit stochastic integration scheme developed by Ewald & Temam (2005; see also Ewald et al 2004) especially for spectral versions of GCMs.…”
Section: (D ) Notes On Numerical Techniques Involving Sdesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each LIM (equations and ) is then integrated forward 200,000 years using the Heun stochastic integration method (Ewald & Penland, ; Rümelin, ) with a time step of 3 hr; then monthly output is sampled. Deviations from Gaussianity in observed and modeled time series, represented by a centered variable x , are determined by the sample skewness S=x3x23false/2 and sample kurtosis K=x4x22 (Joanes & Gill, ).…”
Section: Lim Driven By Cam Noise (Cam‐lim)mentioning
confidence: 99%