2012
DOI: 10.1260/1475-472x.11.7-8.783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Investigation of 3-D Supersonic Jet Flows Using Large-Eddy Simulation

Abstract: The farfield noise generated by supersonic jets is investigated by a computational aeroacoustics methodology that couples 3-D large-eddy simulation (LES) near field data with the Ffowcs Williams-Hawkings method for farfield noise prediction. In order to accurately simulate jets at off-design supersonic conditions, we employ LES with characteristic filters for shock-capturing. This approach limits the dissipation of noise-producing turbulent fluctuations, and is suitable for incorporation into existing solvers.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21 Furthermore, specialized treatments have been incorporated into the code to reduce CFL timestep restrictions that are caused by the fine grid spacing near the centerline of cylindrical grids, 22,46 and shock capturing capabilities have been added for simulating supersonic jets at off-design conditions. 7 Lastly, a variety of boundary conditions are also available in the LES application. Those utilized here are a non-reflecting outflow boundary condition from Tam and Dong 47, 48 and a stress-free symmetry boundary condition.…”
Section: Iia Computational Aeroacoustics Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…21 Furthermore, specialized treatments have been incorporated into the code to reduce CFL timestep restrictions that are caused by the fine grid spacing near the centerline of cylindrical grids, 22,46 and shock capturing capabilities have been added for simulating supersonic jets at off-design conditions. 7 Lastly, a variety of boundary conditions are also available in the LES application. Those utilized here are a non-reflecting outflow boundary condition from Tam and Dong 47, 48 and a stress-free symmetry boundary condition.…”
Section: Iia Computational Aeroacoustics Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, many LES have been performed without simulating the nozzle geometry [4][5][6][7] or by using a RANS-based solver for the nozzle flow. [8][9][10][11] Reasonable results have been obtained, but greater accuracy is desired.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although beyond the scope of this paper, this methodology has been extended to handle shock waves through the use of characteristic filters [11,45]. See [21] for a description of these methods used with the legacy transposition-based version of the LES application. Our SPIKE-based solver has similarly been extended to allow simulations of supersonic jets, and research on this topic is ongoing.…”
Section: Numerical Methods Of 3-d Lesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-fidelity large eddy simulation (LES), as part of a computational aeroacoustics (CAA) methodology, is a promising tool for studying the fundamental mechanisms of jet noise and for analyzing the impact of nozzle modifications on the farfield noise. 2 In the past, many LES have been performed without simulating the nozzle geometry [3][4][5][6] or by using a Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS)-based solver to determine the flow at the nozzle exit. 7-10 Reasonable results have been obtained but greater accuracy is desired for farfield acoustics predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39,40 A shock-capturing method based on local application of a weighted essentially non-oscillatory (WENO) characteristic filter 41 has also been included for supersonic flows. 6,38 For jet aeroacoustics, cylindrical grids are used with an artificial coarsening treatment in the azimuthal direction to avoid CFL timestep restrictions from the fine spacing near the pole. 35,38,42 Furthermore, an approximate inflow turbulent boundary condition [43][44][45] provides turbulent boundary layers on the interior nozzle walls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%