2015
DOI: 10.1177/0954406215622496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical investigation of a mono-tube damper with a shim stack

Abstract: The objective of this paper is to investigate the operation of a mono-tube damper through the application of Computational Fluid Dynamics analysis to the piston and flows through a series of flexible shims which cover exits of the piston orifices. The shims and orifices combine to form a system of variable area flow paths of the damper in parallel with the permanent bleed orifices. Shim stack stiffness characteristics were obtained using experimental and Finite Element techniques. The deflection characteristic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The former fatigue prediction methods were based on Roark's stress and strain formulas stated in the form of pre-derived and parameterized equations [5]. Nowadays the finite element modeling approach is being implemented to support development of more advanced models [1][6] [7][8] [2][4] [9][10] [11]. The latest research deals with development of FDI (Fluid Structure Interaction) models including morphing of the fluid cavity [7], CFD (Fluid Structure Dynamics) models [12], and experimental techniques as PIV (Particle Image Velocity) [13] [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The former fatigue prediction methods were based on Roark's stress and strain formulas stated in the form of pre-derived and parameterized equations [5]. Nowadays the finite element modeling approach is being implemented to support development of more advanced models [1][6] [7][8] [2][4] [9][10] [11]. The latest research deals with development of FDI (Fluid Structure Interaction) models including morphing of the fluid cavity [7], CFD (Fluid Structure Dynamics) models [12], and experimental techniques as PIV (Particle Image Velocity) [13] [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays the finite element modeling approach is being implemented to support development of more advanced models [1][6] [7][8] [2][4] [9][10] [11]. The latest research deals with development of FDI (Fluid Structure Interaction) models including morphing of the fluid cavity [7], CFD (Fluid Structure Dynamics) models [12], and experimental techniques as PIV (Particle Image Velocity) [13] [14]. There are also other methods applicable in fatigue testing to increase test accuracy and confidence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fluid-structure interaction model was constructed to determine the flow characteristics of a damper with a shim stack in it, (Czop et al, 2012). Inspiringly, all of these scenarios and others were fleshed out in a new article (Bell and Beale, 2017) finished at Oxford Brookes University. The authors concluded HFF 30,4 that the use of CFD techniques allows the damper operational movement to be modelled more realistically and that the use of the Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) k-« model is appropriate to develop the turbulent flow in a shock absorber.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kulkarni et al (2014) studied valve slice’s deformation and its damping force under different pressure drops, and analyzed the influences of the port size, port position, fixed radius, and other-related parameters on the nonlinear velocity. Bell and Beale (2015) worked on the deformation of valve slices in the single-tube shock absorber, and figured out the damping change trend under different number of valve slices. Zhou and Xu (2010) established the corresponding physical model of valve slices using the small deflection question based on elastic mechanics, and derived an accurate calculation method to solve the warping question of slices, and a comparison has been done between the calculation and simulation by finite element method (FEM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%