2017
DOI: 10.1007/s40032-017-0385-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Investigation of Aerodynamic Braking for a Ground Vehicle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vehicle is equipped with a passive front wing and an active rear wing, which, according to [34], is the most common air brake setup. In fact, a front airbrake could significantly disrupt the airflow and reduce the potential downforce and drag generated by the rear wing, which would not receive a freestream airflow any longer [35]. The rear wing can vary its angle of attack, φ r , between the conditions of (i) maximum efficiency in terms of the lift-to-drag ratio and maximum downforce (φ r = −14 deg) and (ii) maximum drag (φ r = −60 deg).…”
Section: Case Study Vehiclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vehicle is equipped with a passive front wing and an active rear wing, which, according to [34], is the most common air brake setup. In fact, a front airbrake could significantly disrupt the airflow and reduce the potential downforce and drag generated by the rear wing, which would not receive a freestream airflow any longer [35]. The rear wing can vary its angle of attack, φ r , between the conditions of (i) maximum efficiency in terms of the lift-to-drag ratio and maximum downforce (φ r = −14 deg) and (ii) maximum drag (φ r = −60 deg).…”
Section: Case Study Vehiclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on electrohydraulic braking systems helped production of automatic collision braking systems for autonomous vehicles. Studies on position of air brakes their impact on coefficient of drag also led to interesting improvements in aerodynamics of the vehicle [4][5][6].…”
Section: Theoreticalmentioning
confidence: 99%