2019
DOI: 10.1002/adem.201900591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Investigation of Filtration Influenced by Microscale CO Bubbles in Steel Melt

Abstract: Herein, the influence of the formation of carbon monoxide bubbles on steel cleaning and inclusion removal is addressed. The focus herein is the effect of filter surface bubbles formation on the level of melt cleanliness and the cleaning efficiency. The CO bubbles develop due to the reaction between carbon and oxygen on the filter's surface. A numerical model is developed to consider the effect of this phenomenon on the cleanliness of steel melt. The CO bubbles leave the filter and capture nonmetallic inclusion… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that for the inclusions to float to the steel–slag contact, there must be outside forces at play. Amjad Asad et al [ 48 ] developed a numerical model to consider the process of cobubble formation and showed that the formation of cobubbles on the surface of inclusions is the main reason for the improvement of melt cleanliness. In a physical simulation of the removal of inclusions in a bottom‐blown argon ladle, Zheng et al [ 49 ] discovered that at small blowing volumes and small bubble sizes, inclusions floated to the slag interface by adhering to the surface of numerous small diffusion bubbles; at large blowing volumes and large bubble sizes, inclusions were carried to the slag interface by the wake after the bubbles.…”
Section: Mathematical Model For Removing Inclusionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that for the inclusions to float to the steel–slag contact, there must be outside forces at play. Amjad Asad et al [ 48 ] developed a numerical model to consider the process of cobubble formation and showed that the formation of cobubbles on the surface of inclusions is the main reason for the improvement of melt cleanliness. In a physical simulation of the removal of inclusions in a bottom‐blown argon ladle, Zheng et al [ 49 ] discovered that at small blowing volumes and small bubble sizes, inclusions floated to the slag interface by adhering to the surface of numerous small diffusion bubbles; at large blowing volumes and large bubble sizes, inclusions were carried to the slag interface by the wake after the bubbles.…”
Section: Mathematical Model For Removing Inclusionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current article will not deal with bubble formation on filter surface because it was found that this aspect has a negligible influence on melt cleanliness. [ 27 ]…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the authors reported high cleaning efficiency of the steel melt. In another investigation by Asad et al, [ 27 ] the authors performed numerical simulation to study the impact of bubble formation at filter surface on melt cleanliness. The authors concluded that the CO bubble formation with subsequent inclusion attachment to the bubbles at filter surface has a negligible positive effect on melt cleanliness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the CO formation contributes to a "reactive" deoxidation of the molten steel, [9,[22][23][24] whereas the CO bubbles entrap and remove nonmetallic inclusions "actively." [25,26] The increase in the amount of dissolved Al in the reaction zone is regarded as the main reason for the formation of secondary corundum on the surface of the Al 2 O 3 ─C filter ceramics. However, the existing models cannot explain the nature of the continuous layer, which forms in the first reaction step directly on the surface of the functionalized filter, its role as a substrate for the growth of the secondary corundum and its contribution to the filtering of the nonmetallic inclusions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%