“…Hence, sub-modeling has an advantage over the typical FE approach in that it uses a local micromodel with boundary conditions that are based on the preanalyzed global model results to determine the local mechanical responses. This approach can be employed to investigate the mechanical behavior of the adhesive phase (Gupta et al, 2004;Liu et al, 2009;Lin et al, 2011). Moreover, a nondestructive analysis using micro-computerized tomography (micro-CT) can be used for a three-dimensional (3D) analysis of the tooth, post-space volumes and void/bubble morphology to generate an accurate 3D reconstructed FE model (Grande et al, 2008).…”