2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2013.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical methods for the discretization of random fields by means of the Karhunen–Loève expansion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
108
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 234 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
108
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We refer to [2,21,22] for details on the computation of exact eigenvalues for these kernels. Kernel (23) is a common benchmark for Fredholm integral eigenvalue problems [1,4,5,[22][23][24]. S.P.…”
Section: Other Examples Of Kernelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We refer to [2,21,22] for details on the computation of exact eigenvalues for these kernels. Kernel (23) is a common benchmark for Fredholm integral eigenvalue problems [1,4,5,[22][23][24]. S.P.…”
Section: Other Examples Of Kernelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent popularity of numerical methods for partial differential equations with random input data based on the Karhunen-Loève expansion of random fields has vitalized the research on numerical methods for Fredholm integral eigenvalue equations [1][2][3]. One of these techniques is the Galerkin method with wavelet basis functions, which has been thoroughly studied in the particular case of the Haar basis [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the domain D and the sample space Ω, this approach, based on model reduction techniques, expands any random field, k()xMathClass-punc;0.3emnbspω0.5emnbspMathClass-punc:0.5emnbspDMathClass-bin×ΩMathClass-rel→double-struckR, in a sum of products of functions of the stochastic and deterministic parameters in a Fourier-type series. In this way, a random variable is defined within the random field k at a certain point x ∈ D , thus a real number k ( x , ω) is obtained for each realization ω ∈ Ω (Betz et al, 2004; Eiermann et al, 2007; Sachdeva et al, 2007). …”
Section: Uncertainty and Variability In Computational Models: Propagamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods, described and compared in [26] can be used to approximate the eigenfunctions more efficiently, such as collocation and Galerkin integration [26]. In this case, the eigen-functions are approximated by a set ofñ s < n s basis functions, leading tõ n s ×ñ s matrix generalized eigen-problem whose complexity is O(2ñ 3 s ).…”
Section: Standard 1d Karhunen-loève Expansionmentioning
confidence: 99%