2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4934474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical model of sonic boom in 3D kinematic turbulence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For near-field pressure prediction, recent lessons learned include the need to run viscous as opposed to inviscid simulations to extract more accurate pressure information, resolving plume effects [21], and inlet integration [22]. Atmospheric propagation also has seen enhancements in the form of lossy propagation [23], adjoint methods [3,24], non-empirical physics-based focus prediction [25], edge of the boom carpet diffraction [26], and atmospheric turbulence [27] effects. However, several other effects such as spherical or ellipsoid Earth effects, mean-flow wind effects [28,29], prediction in the shadow region [26], over-the-top secondary booms etc., have not been extensively researched, particularly for lossy propagation implementations, though formulations exist in literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For near-field pressure prediction, recent lessons learned include the need to run viscous as opposed to inviscid simulations to extract more accurate pressure information, resolving plume effects [21], and inlet integration [22]. Atmospheric propagation also has seen enhancements in the form of lossy propagation [23], adjoint methods [3,24], non-empirical physics-based focus prediction [25], edge of the boom carpet diffraction [26], and atmospheric turbulence [27] effects. However, several other effects such as spherical or ellipsoid Earth effects, mean-flow wind effects [28,29], prediction in the shadow region [26], over-the-top secondary booms etc., have not been extensively researched, particularly for lossy propagation implementations, though formulations exist in literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A state-of-the-art code [26] was developed by UPMC for statistical prediction of sonic boom through turbulent atmosphere. Numerous validation tests have been successfully carried out to simulate the propagation of the sonic boom in a turbulent atmosphere [27] [28] including flow motion, sound speed and density heterogeneities, atmospheric absorption (thermo-viscosity and N2/O2 molecular relaxation) and rigid ground reflection (Figure 8) [24] [28]. Figure 7: Left: example of automatic mesh adapted to shock capturing -Right: ground footprint of sonic boom from ATLLAS II configuration at cruise Mach number 5 (colours indicate peak overpressure in Pa) [24].…”
Section: Ii3 Environmental Impact -Sonic Boom and High Altitude Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For ground track boom, standard deviation is relatively high and positively skewed, indicating that there is a significant probability of high intensity peak pressure. For lateral boom in the shadow zone, peak overpressure is enhanced due to sound scattering by turbulence [28].…”
Section: Low Turbulencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, relatively few studies have focused on vertical and slanted propagation. Some such studies mentioned here include applications to low-flying aircraft, 8 a sound source on a 150m tower, 9 sonic boom propagation, [10][11][12] and auralization of flying aircraft. 13 Ostashev and Wilson 14 provide an additional review of this subject.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%