2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.06.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical modeling of fluid flow and coupled heat and mass transfer in a counter-cross-flow parallel-plate liquid-to-air membrane energy exchanger

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reynoldsnumber (Re) (Vali et al, 2015) is an important parameter for simulation; in this study, this variable was calculated with Eq. et al, 2010).…”
Section: Numerical Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reynoldsnumber (Re) (Vali et al, 2015) is an important parameter for simulation; in this study, this variable was calculated with Eq. et al, 2010).…”
Section: Numerical Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found to be the most crucial parameter affecting the system effectiveness. Vali et al [22] studied a counter-cross LAMEE by investigating the effects of aspect and entrance ratios through numerical modelling, and discovered that the counter-cross-flow configuration would have the same performance as the counter-flow configuration if the membrane surface area is enlarged by 10%. Moghaddam et al [23] introduced a solution-side effectiveness to evaluate the impact of * on dehumidification and regeneration processes, and pointed out that the latent effectiveness difference between the air-side and the solution-side is can be neglected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They focused on the effects of different 97 operating parameters on the system overall energy performance and revealed that the system 98 COP at the design condition is 0.68, while the sensible heat ratio (the ratio of the sensible to 99 total energy removed from the supply air) is in the range of 0.3 to 0.5 under different climatic, operating and design conditions. Vali et al [17] developed a numerical model to evaluate the performance of a counter-cross LAMEE by considering effect of the system design parameters, such as aspect ratio and entrance ratio. They found that the effectiveness is in the range between the effectiveness of pure counter-flow and pure cross-flow LAMEEs with the same membrane area, and the counter-cross-flow LAMEE would have the same performance as a counter-flow LAMEE when the membrane area of practical design is increased by 10%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed previously, many experimental studies have been carried out to investigate the performance of the membrane-based system [3,[12][13][14][15]30]. A few studies evaluate the performance of liquid desiccant system numerically [12][13][14][15][16][17] by examining the effects of several operating and design parameters on the effectiveness of LAMEE or the overall energy performance. Several numerical investigations [18-20, 31, 32] used models that solve momentum equation and continuity equation to obtain velocity field, energy and mass equation to obtain concentration and temperature distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%