2016
DOI: 10.1177/1756827716638814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical modeling of soot formation in a turbulent C2H4/air diffusion flame

Abstract: Soot formation in a lifted C 2 H 4 -Air turbulent diffusion flame is studied using two different paths for soot nucleation and oxidation; by a 2D axisymmetric RANS simulation using ANSYS FLUENT 15.0. The turbulence-chemistry interactions are modeled using two different approaches: steady laminar flamelet approach and flamelet-generated manifold. Chemical mechanism is represented by POLIMI to study the effect of species concentration on soot formation. P1 approximation is employed to approximate the radiative t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using semi-empirical models frequently involves the adjustment of the empirical model constants for a wider fuel application and to correctly fit the experimental data [106]. In recent years, the implementation of semi-empirical models has been related to the numerical modeling of methane/air flames [99], [107], ethylene/air diffusion flames [108], methane and heptane turbulent diffusion flames [109], and sooty kerosene/air diffusion flames [86]. Most of these research efforts accounted for radiation effects and their influence on flame temperature and chemical species formation.…”
Section: Semi-empirical Soot Precursor Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using semi-empirical models frequently involves the adjustment of the empirical model constants for a wider fuel application and to correctly fit the experimental data [106]. In recent years, the implementation of semi-empirical models has been related to the numerical modeling of methane/air flames [99], [107], ethylene/air diffusion flames [108], methane and heptane turbulent diffusion flames [109], and sooty kerosene/air diffusion flames [86]. Most of these research efforts accounted for radiation effects and their influence on flame temperature and chemical species formation.…”
Section: Semi-empirical Soot Precursor Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In steady-state simulations of the SLTJF, a high sensitivity of soot formation to the correct prediction of fuel and air mixing is observed [15,[20][21][22]. This holds for other sooting jet flames, too.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Primarily to include soot formation in the higher hydrocarbons, Hall et al [13] extended the soot inception rate in the previous model, which is based on the formation of two-ringed and three-ringed aromatics from acetylene, benzene and phenyl radicals. Recently, Reddy et al [14][15][16] explored empirical as well as semi-empirical soot models in Delft Flame III [17] and turbulent lifted ethylene-air flame [18] and achieved agreeable predictions as compared to experimental measurements and the published data as well. Lignell et al [19] performed two-dimensional DNS simulations combined with semi-empirical soot modeling in non-premixed turbulent counter-flowing ethylene-air flame using acetylene as a soot precursor; later on Bisetti et al [20] performed DNS in heptane/air turbulent counter-flow non-premixed flame using HMOM as soot model with soot inception rate, based on PAH molecules and their study has provided a brief insights in the soot particle dynamics and particle size distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Fig 16. Contours of the soot volume fraction field where (a) experimental measurement[18]; (b) Moss-Brookes (MB) approach; (c) Moss-Brookes-Hall (MBH) approach; and (d) Method of Moment (MOM) approach using non-gray radiation and equilibrium approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%