1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9853(199902)23:2<141::aid-nag962>3.0.co;2-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical modelling of coupled flow and deformation in fractured rock specimens

Abstract: A dual‐porosity poroelastic model is extended to represent behaviour in cylindrical co‐ordinates for the evaluation of flow‐deformation effects in cylindrical laboratory samples incorporating a central wellbore or non‐repeating axisymmetric injection on the periphery. Nine‐node quadratic elements are used to represent mechanical deformation, while eight‐node linear elements are used to interpolate the pressure fields, which offers significant advantages over the behaviour of other non‐conforming elements. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of potential groundwater contamination by NAPL, as mentioned previously, we are more concerned with the secondary porosity features in the soil because the contaminant will more likely travel in those features compared with the porous matrix [21]. Therefore in the present model, the multiphase flow is concentrated on the secondary porosity features in soil as compared with previous existing models [5][6][7][8][9][10][11], and the governing continuity equations for multiphase flow are reduced to the equations for flow in the secondary porosity features of which the general form is shown in Equation (34). By focusing on the flows through the secondary porosity features, the model is made simpler for groundwater contamination applications in double-porosity featured soil, and the computation time taken is also shortened.…”
Section: Multiphase Flow Continuity Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of potential groundwater contamination by NAPL, as mentioned previously, we are more concerned with the secondary porosity features in the soil because the contaminant will more likely travel in those features compared with the porous matrix [21]. Therefore in the present model, the multiphase flow is concentrated on the secondary porosity features in soil as compared with previous existing models [5][6][7][8][9][10][11], and the governing continuity equations for multiphase flow are reduced to the equations for flow in the secondary porosity features of which the general form is shown in Equation (34). By focusing on the flows through the secondary porosity features, the model is made simpler for groundwater contamination applications in double-porosity featured soil, and the computation time taken is also shortened.…”
Section: Multiphase Flow Continuity Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work was then extended by the same authors to a three-phase flow mathematical model for deforming fractured reservoirs, where a strong coupling was assumed between the fluid flow and the solid deformation in the matrix continuum [9]. The numerical modelling of coupled flow and deformation in fractured rock was also studied by Bai et al [10] but instead of the usual Cartesian coordinates, they used cylindrical coordinates for the evaluation of the flow-deformation effects. The work of Lewis and Ghafouri [9] was extended by Lewis and Pao [11] to account for the displacements of both the porous matrix and the fissures in fractured reservoirs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bai et al (1999) are among the first who considered the effect of fracture deformation on permeability in flow simulations but they neglected the non-linearity of fracture deformation. Later, Shchipanov and Nazarov (2005), Zhao andChen (2006), Shchipanov andRusakov (2008), Khalili (2008), andTaoet al (2009) incorporated fracture geomechanics into modeling of naturally fractured reservoirs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bai et al (1999) are among the first who considered the effect of fracture deformation on permeability in flow simulations but they neglected the non-linearity of fracture deformation. Later, Pao and Lewis (2002), Shchipanov and Nazarov (2005), Zhao and Chen (2006), Shchipanov and Rusakov (2008), Khalili (2008), Bagheri and Settari (2008), and Tao et al (2009) incorporated fracture geomechanics into modeling of naturally fractured reservoirs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%