2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.mspro.2014.06.215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Modelling of Crack Propagation in Friction Stir Welded Joint Made of Aluminium Alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9) on both the advancing and retreating sides, consistent with the symmetrically distributed residual stresses. The central crack propagation turned out to be responsible for specimen failure, with related K I values (mode II and III are almost negligible) approaching the material fracture toughness [19] (as soon as the crack evolves all the way through the thickness a further sharp increase of SIFs along the crack front is expected). On the contrary, SIFs along the lateral crack front, as computed using the J-integral approach [41], were not sufficiently high as compared to the threshold (K maxth =3352014 Pa*m 0.5 ) to produce appreciable crack advances ( Fig.…”
Section: Crack Propagationmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9) on both the advancing and retreating sides, consistent with the symmetrically distributed residual stresses. The central crack propagation turned out to be responsible for specimen failure, with related K I values (mode II and III are almost negligible) approaching the material fracture toughness [19] (as soon as the crack evolves all the way through the thickness a further sharp increase of SIFs along the crack front is expected). On the contrary, SIFs along the lateral crack front, as computed using the J-integral approach [41], were not sufficiently high as compared to the threshold (K maxth =3352014 Pa*m 0.5 ) to produce appreciable crack advances ( Fig.…”
Section: Crack Propagationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Recently, some attempts to numerically assess the fatigue behavior in friction stir welded structures were discussed in literature [19][20][21][22][23][24]. In [20] an approach based on the Boundary Element Method (BEM) was adopted for crack growth simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison with previously described case of crack propagation in a simple (not reinforced) plate, described in [14], indicates somewhat different values for the stress intensity factors and number of cycles. Anyhow, since the stable crack propagation phase was over before the crack has reached the stiffeners, their influence is negligible in this case, and remains to be further investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The analysis of the results has shown that the obtained solutions can be used for the prediction of SIFs of analyzed and acceptable accuracy; well defined mesh, and well-set boundary conditions, 3D simulation of a typical 2D problem by using the XFEM gives very good results [13]. The application of various numerical methods is discretized for 2D and 3D structure models, by considering fracture mechanics laws and enables solving the problems in comfortable manner [14] Crack propagation in un stiffened part of the structure among two Friction stir welded joints are analyzed in this Numerical method XEFM method has been used [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%