8th Aerodynamic Decelerator and Balloon Technology Conference 1984
DOI: 10.2514/6.1984-787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical prediction of deployment, initial fill, and inflation of parachute canopies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where σ s is the Cauchy stress of the structure, ρ s is the density of the structure, f s is the force on the structure, e is the specific internal energy, d v → /dt is the acceleration, and D → and T → are the displacement vector and stress vector of the structure. e solution of equations (2) and (3) is subject to equations (4) and (5) corresponding to the displacement boundary condition on boundary zΩ s 1 and the traction boundary condition on the boundary zΩ s 2 , respectively. e traction boundary is the fluid-structure interaction surface, where the air pressure acts on the fabric canopy.…”
Section: Membrane Shell Of the Porous Canopymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where σ s is the Cauchy stress of the structure, ρ s is the density of the structure, f s is the force on the structure, e is the specific internal energy, d v → /dt is the acceleration, and D → and T → are the displacement vector and stress vector of the structure. e solution of equations (2) and (3) is subject to equations (4) and (5) corresponding to the displacement boundary condition on boundary zΩ s 1 and the traction boundary condition on the boundary zΩ s 2 , respectively. e traction boundary is the fluid-structure interaction surface, where the air pressure acts on the fabric canopy.…”
Section: Membrane Shell Of the Porous Canopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Purvis coupled the kinematic equation of the canopy with that of the fluid in a tight coupling manner, but both the canopy structure model and the flow field model were simplified [1]. en, Purvis improved the coupling model, in which the canopy was used as the MSD model and the two-dimensional Euler equation was used to calculate the flow field [2]. Later on, Stein and Benney used a simplified arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (SALE) CFD program and the MSD model of the canopy to calculate the inflation process of the C-9 flat circular parachute in loose coupling manner [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Progress in parallel computing has enabled the simulation of large and complex problems, yet certain sacrifices have been made to make the problem tractable. Historically, finite element methods (FEM) have been popular, and most problems have been solved with tetrahedral grids and no model for the geometric porosity of the parachute.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As early as the 70s of last century Wolf [1], Moog [2] et al adopted the continuous straightening model and the simplified spring damping model to analyze the parachute straightening process, which can predict the straightening process to a certain extent. By the 1980s, Purvis [3][4][5] created a more complex linear straightening model that discrete the parachute into mass nodes interconnected by damped springs and consider the effects of aerodynamics, tension, gravity, and friction. Purvis used this model to analyze the process of parachute deployment and predict line sail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%