2013
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggt221
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of acoustic emission in brittle rocks by two-dimensional finite-discrete element analysis

Abstract: Stress waves, known as acoustic emissions (AEs), are released by localized inelastic deformation events during the progressive failure of brittle rocks. Although several numerical models have been developed to simulate the deformation and damage processes of rocks, such as non-linear stress-strain behaviour and localization of failure, only a limited number have been capable of providing quantitative information regarding the associated seismicity. Moreover, the majority of these studies have adopted a pseudo-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(96 reference statements)
0
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The clustering of the microcracks created, both in space and time, is deemed to form an AE event. Lisjak et al (2013) developed a quasi-dynamic technique, whereby the fracture is represented by means of cohesive discrete elements in a FEM/DEM code to model AE activities resulting from brittle failure of rock. Although capable of capturing the intrinsic nature of AE activities, this approach is computationally intensive, which limits its application to field-scale models.…”
Section: Advances In Modelling Of Seismic Activities In Rock Formationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The clustering of the microcracks created, both in space and time, is deemed to form an AE event. Lisjak et al (2013) developed a quasi-dynamic technique, whereby the fracture is represented by means of cohesive discrete elements in a FEM/DEM code to model AE activities resulting from brittle failure of rock. Although capable of capturing the intrinsic nature of AE activities, this approach is computationally intensive, which limits its application to field-scale models.…”
Section: Advances In Modelling Of Seismic Activities In Rock Formationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many AE simulation methods have been developed to reproduce and interpret laboratory experimental results, including continuum damage models, particle-based discrete element method (DEM) models, lattice models, and the combined finite-discrete element method (FEM/DEM) models (Lisjak et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to Discrete Finite Element Method, the FEM/DEM uses explicit time integration scheme. The FEM/DEM method is used in rock mechanics applications [125,126] and simulation of the behaviour of stone structures [127]. There were some developments of the method considering the reinforcement between discrete elements with application in concrete, but which can be easily used to simulate the rock slopes or tunnel excavations with anchor reinforcements [128].…”
Section: The Discrete Element Methods (Dem)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The height of each element is h = a/2, thus each block has been meshed with 16 elements. In FEM/DEM, the interfaces are made by specific "crack elements", dedicated four nodes cohesive elements which are embedded between the hedges of all adjacent triangular elements pairs since the beginning of simulation [19]. The potential crack path can open everywhere in the mesh, here in order to simulate the behavior of historic masonry panels, in which cracks usually occur mainly in the mortar joints [20,21], two different joints have been used: one inside the blocks and the other between adjacent blocks.…”
Section: Fem/dem and Dem Model Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to calibrate the two models, cohesion and friction adopted for joints are the same, whereas the fracture energy in FEM/DEM [19] joints has been evaluated on the base of mortar elastic modulus adopted in DEM. As previously stated, in the DEM, due to rigid block hypothesis, forces are applied at block centers, whereas in the FEM/DEM, forces are lumped at the inner nodes of each block subdivision (Fig.…”
Section: Fem/dem and Dem Model Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%