2016
DOI: 10.17559/tv-20140521084228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overview of the numerical methods for the modelling of rock mechanics problems

Abstract: Subject reviewThe numerical methods have their origin in the early 1960s and even at that time it was noted that numerical methods can be successfully applied in various engineering and scientific fields, including the rock mechanics. Moreover, the rapid development of computers was a necessary background for solving computationally more demanding problems and the development process of the methods in general. Thus, we have many different methods presently, which can be separated into two main branches: contin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the conventional FDM suffers from the use of regular grid system for the description of material heterogeneity, complex boundary conditions and fractures (Elmo, 2006;Jing and Hudson, 2002). To overcome these shortcomings, the general FDM has been improved particularly thanks to the development of finite volume methods, which make it capable of using irregular quadrilateral, triangular and Voronoi grids (Figure 6) (Nikolic, et al, 2016). The commercial FLAC code is the most common FDM tool for stress analysis in geomechanics problems.…”
Section: Finite Difference Methods (Fdm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the conventional FDM suffers from the use of regular grid system for the description of material heterogeneity, complex boundary conditions and fractures (Elmo, 2006;Jing and Hudson, 2002). To overcome these shortcomings, the general FDM has been improved particularly thanks to the development of finite volume methods, which make it capable of using irregular quadrilateral, triangular and Voronoi grids (Figure 6) (Nikolic, et al, 2016). The commercial FLAC code is the most common FDM tool for stress analysis in geomechanics problems.…”
Section: Finite Difference Methods (Fdm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jing and Hudson (2002) and Jing (2003) reviewed numerical methods and their application in rock mechanics engineering. Their state of art review has been recently updated by Nikolic et al (2016) and Zhao et al (2011a). Meanwhile, Ingraffea (2007) reviewed different computational fracture mechanics codes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the conventional FDMs have several shortcomings such as material heterogeneity, complicated boundary conditions, and inflexibility in dealing with fractures (Shojaei et al, 2019;Wang, 2020). In general, the FDMs are incompatible for modelling rock mechanics problems (Nikolić et al, 2016).…”
Section: Continuum Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the rapid development of information technology and computational mechanics theory, more and more commercial software based on finite element method (FEM), discrete element method (DEM), boundary element method (BEM), or finite difference method (FDM) has been developed [1][2][3][4][5][6], such as Abaqus [7], Ansys [8,9], FLAC (Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua) [10,11], Rocscience [12], UDEC (Universal Distinct Element Code) [13], and PFC (Particle Flow Code) [14]. Since these pieces of software possess significant merits like low cost, high efficiency, and broad range of applications [15][16][17], they have been widely applied to investigate both the macroscopic and microscopic mechanical behavior of large-scale rock engineering or small-size rock specimens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%