2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of compressive failure of heterogeneous rock-like materials using SPH method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This just demonstrates that the heterogeneity is an important factor influencing the strain rate effect, as mentioned in other works (Ma et al , 2011). This conclusion is also consistent with the experimental results, which show that the poor quality specimen had a larger increase in dynamic strength .…”
Section: Effects Of Heterogeneitysupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This just demonstrates that the heterogeneity is an important factor influencing the strain rate effect, as mentioned in other works (Ma et al , 2011). This conclusion is also consistent with the experimental results, which show that the poor quality specimen had a larger increase in dynamic strength .…”
Section: Effects Of Heterogeneitysupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The parallel RVEbased modeling tool in this paper can provide an alternative way to investigate the complicated failure mechanisms of rock. Rock heterogeneity at micro or meso scales is attributed to the presence of pores, microdamages, grains, and minerals, etc., which strongly influences the macroscopic failure characteristics and is one of the root causes of the complex mechanical behaviors of rock (Xie et al 1997;Bahat et al 2001;Xu et al 2005;Ma et al 2011). For example, even under the simplest one-dimensional (1D) loading, i.e., unconfined uniaxial compression, rock exhibits very complex failure characteristics at macroscopic scale, as shown in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many models have been developed in the field of computational fracture mechanics, such as linear and nonlinear elastic fracture mechanics based methods (Bittencourt et al, 1996;Ingraffea and Manu, 1980;Swenson and Ingraffea, 1988), the extended finite element method (XFEM) (Belytschko and Black, 1999;Karihaloo and Xiao, 2003;Melenk and Babuška, 1996;Sukumar and Prévost, 2003), the cohesive-zone model (Bocca et al, 1991;de Borst, 2003) and meshless methods, such as the element free Galerkin method (EFGM) (Bordas et al, 2008;Fleming et al, 1997). Moreover, discontinuumbased numerical methods that are originally used for granular materials, such as the smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method (Das and Cleary, 2010;Gray et al, 2001;Ma et al, 2011) and the discrete element method (DEM) (Cundall and Strack, 1979;Morris et al, 2004;Shi and Goodman, 1985) have also become increasingly popular in fracture modelling. In actual numerical simulations of engineering applications, the choice of modelling approach should be based on the likely failure mechanism of the material, i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%