“…Many models have been developed in the field of computational fracture mechanics, such as linear and nonlinear elastic fracture mechanics based methods (Bittencourt et al, 1996;Ingraffea and Manu, 1980;Swenson and Ingraffea, 1988), the extended finite element method (XFEM) (Belytschko and Black, 1999;Karihaloo and Xiao, 2003;Melenk and Babuška, 1996;Sukumar and Prévost, 2003), the cohesive-zone model (Bocca et al, 1991;de Borst, 2003) and meshless methods, such as the element free Galerkin method (EFGM) (Bordas et al, 2008;Fleming et al, 1997). Moreover, discontinuumbased numerical methods that are originally used for granular materials, such as the smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method (Das and Cleary, 2010;Gray et al, 2001;Ma et al, 2011) and the discrete element method (DEM) (Cundall and Strack, 1979;Morris et al, 2004;Shi and Goodman, 1985) have also become increasingly popular in fracture modelling. In actual numerical simulations of engineering applications, the choice of modelling approach should be based on the likely failure mechanism of the material, i.e.…”