2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of shrinkage and deformation during sintering in metal binder jetting with experimental validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even the specimens with low absolute GRD deviations, do not ensure a precise dimensional accuracy. This is however in line with the implemented material model, which does not consider anisotropic properties of green parts due to the interlayer gaps in the build direction existing in MBJ (Sadeghi Borujeni et al, 2022).…”
Section: Sintered Specimenssupporting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Even the specimens with low absolute GRD deviations, do not ensure a precise dimensional accuracy. This is however in line with the implemented material model, which does not consider anisotropic properties of green parts due to the interlayer gaps in the build direction existing in MBJ (Sadeghi Borujeni et al, 2022).…”
Section: Sintered Specimenssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The qualified SOVS material model for MBJ presented in the research by Sadeghi Borujeni et al (2022) is used in the current paper to predict sintering deformations. However, the manufacturing elements used to fabricate the specimens in the current study differ in printer, powder size distribution (PSD), printing layer thickness and sintering cycle from those in the research by Sadeghi Borujeni et al Nevertheless, some of material parameters including apparent, bulk and shear viscosity, as well as grain size are mainly affected by temperature, initial grain size, relative density and diffusion coefficients and not dependent on the reported differences (Olevsky, 1998; Riedel and Blug, 2002; Zhang et al , 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model can capture the empirical trend of cylindricity form error and shrinkage at different inclination of hole axis, however some discrepancies have been observed for smallest holes (3 mm diameter), when hole axis is perpendicular to the building direction. The marked underestimation of the experimental results has been ascribed to the combined effect of viscous-plastic material behavior and gravity load, on the basis of previous experimental work on shape deformation of overhanging structure and cantilever beams [23][24][25]. It was supposed that the mass of powder above hole section might have determined an extra deformation of hole section, on the reason of viscous-plastic material behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, unlike traditional PM parts which are pressed to almost 80% relative density before sintering [ 17 , 18 ], BJAM green parts typically have a much lower green part density, typically ranging between 45 and 65% [ 19 ], and thus densification from this state usually results in remnant porosity and a significant distortion of design geometry. Prior research has shown that green densities in the range ∼50% are easily obtainable with WA steel powders [ 3 , 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%