2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.simpat.2015.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of the complete rock blasting response by SPH–DAM–FEM approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The symmetry boundary was employed in the normal direction of the plane; meanwhile, for the other faces of this model, expect for the free surface, the nonreflecting boundary was applied to prevent the waves reflection at the model surface and the imaginary monitoring points were arranged on the top surface of this model, as shown in Figure 3. In this simulation, the parameters of the rock and explosive are given in Tables 1 and 2 [20], respectively. The S wave identification results on the two monitoring points are given in Figure 4 and Table 3.…”
Section: Methods Of S-wave Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The symmetry boundary was employed in the normal direction of the plane; meanwhile, for the other faces of this model, expect for the free surface, the nonreflecting boundary was applied to prevent the waves reflection at the model surface and the imaginary monitoring points were arranged on the top surface of this model, as shown in Figure 3. In this simulation, the parameters of the rock and explosive are given in Tables 1 and 2 [20], respectively. The S wave identification results on the two monitoring points are given in Figure 4 and Table 3.…”
Section: Methods Of S-wave Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field blasting tests were carried out in Fengning pumped storage power station to calculate the parameters value of rock mass by monitoring the blasting vibration signals. The Fengning pumped storage power station, with a capacity [20]. of 3600 MW, is located in Fengning manchu autonomous county in Hebei, China.…”
Section: Field Experimental Studies On Back Analysis and Calculation mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The blast-induced fracture of rock has been modeled and simulated by many authors [12][13][14]. Several scenarios at different scales, including small-scale blasting testing [15][16][17][18], bench and cutting blasting [12,14,19,20], and large-scale modeling and simulations, e.g., mines [19,[21][22][23], have been considered. To simulate the fracture phenomenon, numerous different computational techniques can be implemented to reproduce the dynamic behavior of rock or other brittle materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mesh-based methods can be effectively used but must consider additional factors when dealing with large deformation in the model, e.g., regularization, erosion criteria, softening, and remeshing [24][25][26]. The problem of significant element distortion can be omitted by using different methods, e.g., the arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) formulation [15,18,27], discrete element method (DEM) [28,29] or mesh-free methods like smooth particle hydrodynamics (SPH) [23,30]. It is also possible to couple different techniques; such an approach has proved efficient and reliable in the case of blast-induced brittle fracture [17,23,28], as well as other engineering problems [31][32][33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the blasting shock wave by explosive will cause damage of rock mass that is unnecessary, which may lead to many accidents. erefore, the dynamic response of rock under blasting load has attracted many scholars' attention [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%