Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (COM 2015
DOI: 10.7712/120115.3409.789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Simulation of the Limit Non-Linear Behaviour of Unreinforced Stone Masonry Under in-Plane State of Stress From Gravitational and Seismic Actions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The largest values of tensile stress S11 (3.46 MPa, Figure 28b) develop at the bottom fibre of the crown of the arch. This is a relatively large tensile stress value that is expected to exceed the tensile capacity of the stone masonry of this bridge [16]. The largest value of tensile stress S22 (1.5 1 MPa, Figure 28f) develops at the area where the primary arch joins the foundation block.…”
Section: Simplified Dynamic Spectral Numerical Simulation Of the Seismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The largest values of tensile stress S11 (3.46 MPa, Figure 28b) develop at the bottom fibre of the crown of the arch. This is a relatively large tensile stress value that is expected to exceed the tensile capacity of the stone masonry of this bridge [16]. The largest value of tensile stress S22 (1.5 1 MPa, Figure 28f) develops at the area where the primary arch joins the foundation block.…”
Section: Simplified Dynamic Spectral Numerical Simulation Of the Seismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both these remarks indicate locations of distress for this stone-masonry bridge predicting in this way the appearance of structural damage. On the contrary, the largest value of compression stress equal to S11 = −4.3 MPa (Figure 28d, for combination 7) is expected to be easily met by the compression capacity of the stone masonry for this bridge [16]. Structural Bridge Engineering…”
Section: Simplified Dynamic Spectral Numerical Simulation Of the Seismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical studies of bridges and other stone and concrete structures of historical value have been performed in [8][9][10][11][12]. In these studies numerical techniques addressing the interaction of mortar and stone blocks or block-block non-linear contact were also explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drosopoulos [9] and co-workers studied the ultimate failure load of stone arch bridges based on 2-D, plane strain finite element analysis which included interfaces, simulation of cracks, unilateral friction contacts and the implementation of a pathfollowing technique to estimate the ultimate load. Studies of other important masonry stone structures throughout Greece and relevant data bases are presented in [10][11][12]. Roman bridges are discussed in [13] and stone masonry bridges around Greece in [14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical studies that involved relatively complex non-linear analyses were performed by the authors [24] as well as by other researchers in the past [16], [17], [18]. Such analyses try to numerically simulate the various non-linear mechanisms that are expected to develop at this type of stone masonry structures when subjected to intense earthquake ground motions [15], [25]. The simplified numerical analysis presented here, is not capable to simulate such nonlinear mechanisms.…”
Section: Dead Load + Eymentioning
confidence: 99%