2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of undrained insertion problems in geotechnical engineering with the Particle Finite Element Method (PFEM)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
77
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
77
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Other meshfree methodologies that have applied contact mechanics in geotechnical applications are the arbitrarian Lagrangian‐Eulerian formulations (ALE) such as the so‐called remeshing and interpolation technique by small strain developed by Randolph et al, the so‐called efficient ALE approach developed by Nazem et al, and the successive built‐in implementation of ALE in Abaqus/Explicit, currently known as the coupled Eulerian‐Lagrangian . A comparative review of these ALE methods has been recently presented by Wang et al Finally, the particle finite element method, an updated Lagrangian approach that avoids mesh distortion problems by frequent remeshing, seems suitable to address geotechnical insertion problems …”
Section: Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other meshfree methodologies that have applied contact mechanics in geotechnical applications are the arbitrarian Lagrangian‐Eulerian formulations (ALE) such as the so‐called remeshing and interpolation technique by small strain developed by Randolph et al, the so‐called efficient ALE approach developed by Nazem et al, and the successive built‐in implementation of ALE in Abaqus/Explicit, currently known as the coupled Eulerian‐Lagrangian . A comparative review of these ALE methods has been recently presented by Wang et al Finally, the particle finite element method, an updated Lagrangian approach that avoids mesh distortion problems by frequent remeshing, seems suitable to address geotechnical insertion problems …”
Section: Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the aforementioned computational methods are restricted to the small strain range. If large deformation problems are to be solved, particle or meshfree methodologies arise as suitable alternatives for simulating such problems . The name of “meshfree methods” comes from the fact that they do not rely on meshes but on points to approximate functions and differential operators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, low‐order elements are preferred for its flexibility in adaptive remeshing codes such as the particle finite element method, which is typically reliant on linear elements. ()…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PFEM was originally developed to address fluid‐structure interaction problems() and has been later adapted to study soil‐structure interaction. () A cornerstone of PFEM is frequent remeshing for which low‐order elements are very advantageous. The elements employed have equal order interpolation for all the nodal basic variables, chosen as the mixture displacement, water relative displacement and water pressure, a formulation with shorthand u − w − p w , resulting in a P1‐P1‐P1 element.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These extreme situations may be dealt with using simpler single-phase formulations. For instance, for undrained conditions, elasto-plastic formulations using a quasi-incompressible elastic model alongside an isochoric plastic law are applicable [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%