2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0038-092x(99)00056-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of unsteady aerodynamics effects in horizontal-axis wind turbines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show the ability of the applied panel method to provide detailed information on the pressure and velocity distributions over the blade surface as compared with other applied approaches. A three-dimensional panel method was also used by Bermúdez et al [5] for simulating the aerodynamic behaviour of horizontal-axis wind turbines, and the comparison between experimental data and the computed results with the panel method shows a good agreement. Gebhardt et al [6] utilized the vortex-lattice method to simulate the unsteady aerodynamic behaviour of large horizontal-axis wind turbines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show the ability of the applied panel method to provide detailed information on the pressure and velocity distributions over the blade surface as compared with other applied approaches. A three-dimensional panel method was also used by Bermúdez et al [5] for simulating the aerodynamic behaviour of horizontal-axis wind turbines, and the comparison between experimental data and the computed results with the panel method shows a good agreement. Gebhardt et al [6] utilized the vortex-lattice method to simulate the unsteady aerodynamic behaviour of large horizontal-axis wind turbines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These reports touch upon the relevant research carried out by the participants in the tasks and they include extensive literature lists. A large part of these lists are added to this article, where the references Shipley, Miller, Robinson, Luttges, and Simms (), Hansen (), van Rooij, Timmer, and Bruining (), Acker and Hand (), Bermudez, Velasquez, and Matesanz (), Bjorck (), Bruining (), Chaviaropoulos et al (), Duque, van Dam, and Hughes (), Feigl (), Graham & Brown, , Leclerc and Masson (), Maeda and Schepers (), Miller et al (), Schepers (), Schepers, Feigl, Van Rooij, and Bruining (), Schepers and van Rooij (), Schreck, Robinson, Hand, and Simms (), Simms, Robinson, Hand, and Fingersh (), Snel (), Strzelczyk (, ), van Rooij (, ), van Rooij, Bruining, and Schepers (), and van Rooij and Schepers () are related to IEA tasks 14/18.…”
Section: Aerodynamic Measurements: Results and Progressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results show that RANS calculations correlate well with experimental data. Bemudez et al [5] studied both steady and unsteady aerodynamic effects for a HAWT for different variables such as air velocity (magnitude and direction) and rotor yaw. Ebert and Wood [6] showed that CFD results were very close to experimental data.…”
Section: Itm Web Of Conferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%