2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.09.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation study of spallation in reinforced concrete plates subjected to blast loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
97
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
97
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Selecting a value for maximum shear strain is not straightforward and it is highly dependent on the material model. A value between 0.1 and 0.9 was reported in the literature (Coughlin et al 2010;Morris et al 2013;Wang et al 2010;Xu and Lu 2006). It was concluded that a value of 0.1 can better describe this criterion for CSCM during this contactimpact problem.…”
Section: Solution Techniques and Assessment Metricsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Selecting a value for maximum shear strain is not straightforward and it is highly dependent on the material model. A value between 0.1 and 0.9 was reported in the literature (Coughlin et al 2010;Morris et al 2013;Wang et al 2010;Xu and Lu 2006). It was concluded that a value of 0.1 can better describe this criterion for CSCM during this contactimpact problem.…”
Section: Solution Techniques and Assessment Metricsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…An extensive literature review was performed here in order to find a suitable failure criterion for tip-over impact of concrete casks in LS-DYNA (Hallquist 2006). Table 5 summarizes each work based on the mesh, failure criteria and type of the structural concrete (Coughlin et al 2010;Farnam et al 2010;Huang and Wu 2009;Islam et al 2011;Shi et al 2010;Tang and Hao 2010;Teng et al 2003;Tu and Lu 2010;Wang et al 2009;Wang et al 2010;Wu et al 2011;Xu and Lu 2006).…”
Section: Solution Techniques and Assessment Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these equations are considered conservative as damage and crater behavior were defined in term of weight of explosive, whereas the damage behavior is highly likely to be influenced by the standoff distance and incidence angle in the form of scaled-distance function. However, when Equation (13) is plotted against the weight of explosion as shown in Figure 10, the results of scabbed crater diameter are in the middle of the maximum and minimum curves produced by Xu and Lu (2006). The experimental data from Yuan et al (2008) has lower scabbed crater diameter at weight of explosion of 5kg, 8kg and 10kg.…”
Section: Spalling and Scabbingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therefore, blast loading is known as the most destructive dynamic load that a structure may experience (Xu and Lu, 2006). If an explosion occurs in close proximately to the structure, blast loading that travel as shock wave will setup an internal compressive stress wave and subsequently produce shattering effects on the material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reinforced concrete slabs are typically analyzed for blast loadings using one of two methods of very different complexity: (2) finite element analysis methods (e.g., [1,2]); and (1) equivalent single degree of freedom (SDOF) analysis [3,4]. SDOF methods are common nowadays for blast design of protective structural elements [4,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%