2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.phpro.2011.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Simulations - A Versatile Approach for Better Understanding Dynamics in Laser Material Processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the last two decades, literature has been reported on sophisticated modeling approaches [7][8][9][10][11][12] and experimental techniques [13][14][15][16][17][18] to study the dynamics of the keyhole phenomena during high power density fusion welding technologies, such as laser welding. From a modeling perspective, the interface deformation that leads to keyhole formation during the laser welding has been studied intensively using various numerical techniques, including a volume-of-fluid approach [13,14] and a level set method. [9] Recently, Courtois et al [9] have proposed a level set approach and included the influence of the electromagnetic field to accurately capture the energy reflection inside the keyhole.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last two decades, literature has been reported on sophisticated modeling approaches [7][8][9][10][11][12] and experimental techniques [13][14][15][16][17][18] to study the dynamics of the keyhole phenomena during high power density fusion welding technologies, such as laser welding. From a modeling perspective, the interface deformation that leads to keyhole formation during the laser welding has been studied intensively using various numerical techniques, including a volume-of-fluid approach [13,14] and a level set method. [9] Recently, Courtois et al [9] have proposed a level set approach and included the influence of the electromagnetic field to accurately capture the energy reflection inside the keyhole.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apparently, the hole diameter reveals the same dependence on focus position as the beam diameter and both range similarly by size. Numerical deviations between the hole diameter and the beam diameter are attributed to melt ejection (Otto et al, 2011). Nonetheless, based on the observed correlation between hole diameter and beam diameter it is possible to adjust the hole diameter easily by the focus position.…”
Section: Minimum Drilling Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect is based on plasma with a temperature gradient which keeps the beam diameter constant. According to Otto et al (2011) reflections inside the hole can result in a reduced beam spread for materials with a high reflection at larger angles of incidence. A further effect is the decreasing power density with increasing laser beam diameter.…”
Section: Minimum Drilling Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several simulation approaches for laser material processing consider fluid-dynamic effects occurring in the heat affected zone [12][13][14]. In this sense, electron beam melting and laser beam melting are specifically investigated in [15][16][17].…”
Section: Microscale Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%