“…They are more pronounced in stationary beam drilling methods such as percussion drilling, compared with lower throughput, moving beam methods like trepanning and helical drilling [12]. To address these issues, for both drilling categories, new methods and tools have been developed, in particular changing the focusing position [8,13], the use of assisted gases [14][15][16][17], beam rotation [18,19], drilling under water [20], two-side drilling [21,22], new drilling cycles [12] and also different modelling and optimizing approaches to identify the optimum processing window [23][24][25][26][27]. Furthermore, the effects of process settings were investigated, too, especially peak power and pulse width effects on holes' repeatability in regards to the entry diameters [28] the evolution of shallow craters' diameter and depth in regards to number of pulses (NoP) and fluence [29] and the effect of different laser parameters such as average power on circularity, HAZ and taper angle [30] Other parameters that affect the laser drilling process, especially pulse energy, fluence and intensity, have been investigated, too.…”