1979
DOI: 10.1115/1.3450974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Solution of Solid Propellant Transient Combustion

Abstract: Three thermal theories of solid propellant combustion, [1, 2, 3], all based on the quasi-steady flame assumption, were subjected to a rapidly rising external pressure field simulating a gun combustion chamber. Transient burning rates were computed by four different numerical solution methods; the best results were obtained with an invariant imbedding scheme. The numerical predictions show that (1) burning rate “runaway” is a numerical difficulty and is not a solution to the models, (2) the final state of an in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One can argue that the use of Eq. (30) or some comparable damping function, while empirical, parallels the approach taken by past researchers in using a stipulated surface thermal gradient; both approaches act to constrain the exchange of energy through the burning surface interface, allow for some variability in better comparing to a given set of experimental data, and prevent so-called burning-rate "runaway" (unstable divergence of r b with time) [26]. As discussed in [25], the use of K b at a set value does allow for a converged solution that is independent of the increment size for )t and )y, as long as one respects the Fourier stability requirement noted earlier.…”
Section: Equations For Propellant Burning Ratementioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One can argue that the use of Eq. (30) or some comparable damping function, while empirical, parallels the approach taken by past researchers in using a stipulated surface thermal gradient; both approaches act to constrain the exchange of energy through the burning surface interface, allow for some variability in better comparing to a given set of experimental data, and prevent so-called burning-rate "runaway" (unstable divergence of r b with time) [26]. As discussed in [25], the use of K b at a set value does allow for a converged solution that is independent of the increment size for )t and )y, as long as one respects the Fourier stability requirement noted earlier.…”
Section: Equations For Propellant Burning Ratementioning
confidence: 93%
“…The idealized "pre-heated" inert particle assumption, entering the central core flow at T f , is shown in Eq. (26). As outlined in [18], the viscous interaction between the gas and a particle from the i th particle set is represented by the drag force D i , and the heat transfer from the core flow to a particle from the i th set is defined by Q i .…”
Section: B Equations Of Motion Governing Two-phase Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pressure-based burning component may be found through de St. Robert's law: (13) The flow-based erosive burning component (negative and positive) is established through the following expression [18]: (14) where at lower flow speeds, the negative component resulting from a stretched combustion zone thickness (δ r > δ o ) may cause an appreciable drop in the base pressuredependent burning rate r o . The stretching of the flame zone at low speed may be viewed as being the result of a laminar-like sliding process of the local axial flow in the boundary layer acting to extend and curve the path of a representative particle moving up from the burning surface towards the flame front, such that the effective reactive length is increased.…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus of this study will be on strong axial shock-wave-related symptoms; two-and three-dimensional instability symptoms of smaller magnitude, e.g., due to vortex shedding observed in segmented motors, will not be under consideration here. A more recent version of a transient burning rate model (based on the Zeldovich-Novozhilov [Z-N] approach [13][14][15][16], with specific modifications for the simulation model as described in [17]) is employed for the present study. The latest version of this Z-N model allows for the inclusion of a net surface heat of reaction term (∆H s ), that better enables a match to experimental response data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[81][82][83][84][85][86][87], oscillatory burning (Refs. [88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107], deflagration and low pressure extinction of ammonium oerchlorate (Refs. [108][109][110][111][112][113][114][115][116][117][118][119][120][121][122], low pressure extinction of composite propellants (Refs.…”
Section: -Background or The Research Studymentioning
confidence: 99%