2010
DOI: 10.1002/num.20633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical solutions of the Kawahara type equations using radial basis functions

Abstract: This study is carried out to investigate the numerical solutions of the Kawahara, KdV-Kawahara, and the modified Kawahara equations by using the meshless method based on collocation with radial basis functions. Results of the meshless method with different radial basis functions are presented for the travelling wave solution of the Kawahara type equations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, a lot of researchers have studied numerical solutions of the modified Kawahara equation. For instance, Fourier splitting method is used by Suarez and Morales [1], the meshless method of lines is proposed in Bibi et al [19], Gong et al [20] utilized multisymplectic Fourier pseudo‐spectral method, collocation methods based on RBFs are developed by Zarebnia and Aghili [21] and Dereli and Dağ [22], Bagherzadeh [23] applied B‐spline collocation method, Crank–Nicolson differential quadrature method is applied by Korkmaz and Dağ [24], Yuan et al [25] employed dual Petrov–Galerkin method, new multisymplectic integrator is introduced by Wen‐Jun and Yu‐Shun [26], and Marinov and Marinova [27] devised finite difference method [28]. Recently, RBF‐finite difference method is used to solve Kawahara equation by Rasoulizadeh and Rashidinia [29], and differential quadrature method is applied to the Kawahara‐type equations by Başhan [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, a lot of researchers have studied numerical solutions of the modified Kawahara equation. For instance, Fourier splitting method is used by Suarez and Morales [1], the meshless method of lines is proposed in Bibi et al [19], Gong et al [20] utilized multisymplectic Fourier pseudo‐spectral method, collocation methods based on RBFs are developed by Zarebnia and Aghili [21] and Dereli and Dağ [22], Bagherzadeh [23] applied B‐spline collocation method, Crank–Nicolson differential quadrature method is applied by Korkmaz and Dağ [24], Yuan et al [25] employed dual Petrov–Galerkin method, new multisymplectic integrator is introduced by Wen‐Jun and Yu‐Shun [26], and Marinov and Marinova [27] devised finite difference method [28]. Recently, RBF‐finite difference method is used to solve Kawahara equation by Rasoulizadeh and Rashidinia [29], and differential quadrature method is applied to the Kawahara‐type equations by Başhan [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bibi et al (2011) introduced a meshless method for Kawahara equation. Another radial basis method is used by Dereli and Dag (2012). Safavi and Khajehnasiri (2016) studied on time-and space-fractional Kawahara equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will adopt the SW solution to be our exact solution to compare with our numerical approximations. Finite differences, finite elements, and radial basis function have been used to get numerical integration of the Kawahara equation [7][8][9]. The present method has high accuracy; it is fast and easy to implement as seen in other works that deal with nonlinearity-see, for instance, [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%