2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Study for a Marine Current Turbine Blade Performance under Varying Angle of Attack

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This research simulates the turbine with variations of Tip Speed Ratio (TSR) and the angle of attack of the hydrofoil. Details of the variations of the geometry that determined to find the most optimum geometry [13] [14], as explained in Table 1. Table 1, the variations of velocity speed of the flow were put, while the rotational speed and the radius of the turbine remaining constant.…”
Section: Methods Geometry Modeling and Meshingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This research simulates the turbine with variations of Tip Speed Ratio (TSR) and the angle of attack of the hydrofoil. Details of the variations of the geometry that determined to find the most optimum geometry [13] [14], as explained in Table 1. Table 1, the variations of velocity speed of the flow were put, while the rotational speed and the radius of the turbine remaining constant.…”
Section: Methods Geometry Modeling and Meshingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meshing or grinding is a discretization of the continuous fluid domain into discrete computation so the CFD numerical solution can be done using the ANSYS FLUENT software to obtain the solutions such as speed, pressure, fluid contour, and other solutions for each of the discrete domain [14,15,16]. Figure 2 shows the visualization of the meshing result.…”
Section: Methods Geometry Modeling and Meshingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the profiles of the hydrokinetic turbine blades, small α are usually chosen where the lift coefficient is high and the drag coefficient is low [21]- [25]. These coefficients depend on the water velocity and, hence, on the Reynolds number, because when the viscosity forces are greater compared to the inertial forces, the effects of the friction are increased, affecting the velocities, the pressure gradient and the lift generated by the hydrodynamic profile [1]- [3], [27]- [28]. Therefore, for the design of the blade of the hydrokinetic turbine, the profiles studied were selected to have a large lift-to-drag ratio.…”
Section: D Javafoil Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flow field around Eppler 420 hydrofoil with and without flap and the lift and drag coefficients were calculated by using CFD simulation. The steady-state governing the equations of continuity and momentum conservation were solved combined with the ݇ − ߱ shear-stress transport (SST) turbulence model using the ANSYs-Fluent code [27], [28]. Three case studies were simulated (Figure 4).…”
Section: D Cfd Modeling and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurements of the gap and overlap were provided in terms of a percentage of the chord length of the main element (gap = % C 1 , overlap = % C 1 ). The third parameter of the definition of the gap-overlap is the "deflection angle" (δ), which is defined as the angle between the main element and the flap chord; δ a positive value when the rotation flap is mobilized in a clockwise direction [29][30][31][32][33][34]42]. In addition to the mentioned variables, the flap chord length (C 2 ) was considered as a variable, which was given as a percentage of the main element chord (C 2 = % C 1 ), like the gap and the overlap.…”
Section: Description Of the Optimization Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%