2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2004.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical study of flow field in cyclones of different height

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
54
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
5
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be observed that near the duct underflow position, 0.135 m, the profile resembles the parabolic behavior, with the concave side up, because the temperature of the conical wall is warmer than the center of the hydrocyclone and the fluid flow is downward in this region. At the axial positions 0.275 m and 0.412 m, the temperature profiles have approximately similar behavior, because the areas of recirculation and reverse flow present in this region and this is consistent with the literature [1,11,15].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…It can be observed that near the duct underflow position, 0.135 m, the profile resembles the parabolic behavior, with the concave side up, because the temperature of the conical wall is warmer than the center of the hydrocyclone and the fluid flow is downward in this region. At the axial positions 0.275 m and 0.412 m, the temperature profiles have approximately similar behavior, because the areas of recirculation and reverse flow present in this region and this is consistent with the literature [1,11,15].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Their study of the effect of the inlet velocity on the pressure drop found that the RSM gave the closest agreement with the experimental results. The superiority of the RSM over other models has been established by Meier et al (1999), Xiang et al (2005), Qian et al (2006), Wan et al (2008) and Kaya et al (2009). These investigations of various characteristics of cyclone separator flow field, such as velocity profiles, pressure drop, effect of particle size, mass loading, separation efficiency, effect of pressure and temperature, have reemphasized the ability of the RSM for realistic prediction of the flow field inside cyclone separators.…”
Section: Choice Of Turbulence Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CFD-3D analysis is an efficient and economical approach of understanding the fluid dynamics process in complex plants, providing a precious way to evaluate how it is affected by changes of operating conditions and geometric shapes. At this aim, the CFD approach has been used by many authors [1,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]; the papers deal with issues relative to the flow of gas-solid suspensions predicting solid separation efficiency, at different operating conditions, in good agreement with the experimental evidences. Furthermore, in [13][14][15] the authors proved as the Reynolds Stress Model is the suitable turbulent model for cyclone with strong swirling flow.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…At present, in literature, it is proved that the most utilized turbulence modelling is the RSM turbulence model [1,3,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. In addition, all these papers simulate isothermal plants while, the present work has to take into account the thermal exchange in its various forms (convection and radiation).…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation