2021
DOI: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01100-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical study of high performance, low hysteresis, and stable perovskite solar cells with examining the optimized parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[88] If a device contains bigger grains, then essential activation energy for ion migration will also be higher, which ultimately enhances the energy barrier for ion migration. [17,[154][155][156][157][158] So we can conclude that the crystal size of perovskite affects the hysteresis. The inclusion of K þ ions decreases the trap density and increases the crystal size, making the conduction band minimum of perovskite higher, which reduces the hysteresis.…”
Section: Crystal Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[88] If a device contains bigger grains, then essential activation energy for ion migration will also be higher, which ultimately enhances the energy barrier for ion migration. [17,[154][155][156][157][158] So we can conclude that the crystal size of perovskite affects the hysteresis. The inclusion of K þ ions decreases the trap density and increases the crystal size, making the conduction band minimum of perovskite higher, which reduces the hysteresis.…”
Section: Crystal Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[131,140,151,152] The crystal size of perovskite can also be changed by ion doping, enhanced fabrication process, and heterojunction engineering. [156,[159][160][161]…”
Section: Crystal Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters used for simulating the solar module: Glass/FTO/ TiO 2 /K 0.005 MA 0.995 PbI 3 /Spiro-OMeTAD/Ag are listed in Table 1 input parameters for FTO, TiO 2 , and Spiro-OMeTAD were taken from existing literature [18,19]. For the absorbing layer, the input parameters were used as same as in previous studies [20][21][22]. The bulk defect density of the absorbing layer was considered to be 5 × 10 16 cm −3 for best matching with the experimental results.…”
Section: Simulation Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%