2018
DOI: 10.12716/1001.12.04.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Study of Hydrodynamic Derivatives and Course Stability under Ship-Bank Interaction

Abstract: Since ship-bank interaction affects the manoeuvrability of a ship navigating close to a bank, the determination of hydrodynamic derivatives is of great importance to assess the ship manoeuvrability. To obtain the hydrodynamic derivatives of the KVLCC2 model ship with different water depths and ship-bank distances, the simulation of PMM tests are carried out using an unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) based solver. Hybrid dynamic mesh technique is proposed to realize the simulation of pure yaw test… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the methods of estimating hydrodynamic parameters may be classified into four types: the empirical formula method (Wang et al , 2019), the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method (He et al , 2016; Jin et al , 2016; Liu et al , 2018; Zhang et al , 2019), the captive model experiment method (Park et al , 2017; Xu et al , 2017) and the parameter identification method (Forrest et al , 2018; Kiselev et al , 2017; Sabet et al , 2017). Though the methods mentioned above achieve general performance, each method has weaknesses for parameter estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the methods of estimating hydrodynamic parameters may be classified into four types: the empirical formula method (Wang et al , 2019), the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method (He et al , 2016; Jin et al , 2016; Liu et al , 2018; Zhang et al , 2019), the captive model experiment method (Park et al , 2017; Xu et al , 2017) and the parameter identification method (Forrest et al , 2018; Kiselev et al , 2017; Sabet et al , 2017). Though the methods mentioned above achieve general performance, each method has weaknesses for parameter estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%