2010 10th IEEE International Conference on Solid-State and Integrated Circuit Technology 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icsict.2010.5667600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical study of performance comparison between junction and junctionless thin-film transistors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the SS value is relatively higher than the best value in single crystal silicon devices [15] and recent JLTs [20,43,44], it is still comparable with the lowest reported value of vertical silicon nanowire array devices [45]. In general, the degradation of SS is due to the increase in the interface state density, decrease of oxide capacitance, and increase in the doping concentration of metal oxide silicon transistor’s channel [46].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the SS value is relatively higher than the best value in single crystal silicon devices [15] and recent JLTs [20,43,44], it is still comparable with the lowest reported value of vertical silicon nanowire array devices [45]. In general, the degradation of SS is due to the increase in the interface state density, decrease of oxide capacitance, and increase in the doping concentration of metal oxide silicon transistor’s channel [46].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important reason for higher SS value in our case could be explained by the lack of oxide layer between the gate and the channel. It lacks the fixed potential drop in cross section of the nanowire (perpendicular to the current flow), which is necessary for inducing sufficient potential to change current linearly with the gate voltage [ 44 ]. In SGJLT device, the asymmetry of the gate location provides higher SS value compare to DGJLT device with the symmetric gate locations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It lacks the fixed potential drop in a cross-section of the nanowire (perpendicular to the current flow), which is required for inducing sufficient potential to change current linearly with the gate voltage [17]. The electric capacitance and polarisation in the gap between the channel and the gate, filled with air, is insufficient to provide the strong electric field and make the accumulation layer (because of low concentration).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems that the most important parameter which plays the key role here could be the capacitance between the gate and the channel. Smaller L G lacks the fixed potential drop in cross section of the channel (perpendicular to the current flow), which is necessary for inducing sufficient potential to change current linearly with the gate voltage [45]. This effect has been improved by increasing the gate length which suppresses the SS.…”
Section: Depletion Regimementioning
confidence: 99%