2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-012-1252-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical study on human model shape and grid dependency for indoor thermal comfort evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, significant differences were found in the regions close to the CSP surface. This was consistent with the conclusion drawn by Seo et al [11], who also found that more precise results were obtained for the evaluation of thermal comfort when a detailed CSP was used. Therefore, it could be expected that simplified CSPs may be sufficient for predictions of the global flow field, while detailed CSPs would be preferred when the near-occupant regions or the occupants themselves are concerned.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, significant differences were found in the regions close to the CSP surface. This was consistent with the conclusion drawn by Seo et al [11], who also found that more precise results were obtained for the evaluation of thermal comfort when a detailed CSP was used. Therefore, it could be expected that simplified CSPs may be sufficient for predictions of the global flow field, while detailed CSPs would be preferred when the near-occupant regions or the occupants themselves are concerned.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…It should be noted that the scenarios of Deevy and Gobeau [16] and Seo et al [11] were quite simple, i.e. unfurnished rooms containing a single occupant in the middle and excluded the interactions between multiple or moving occupants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design domain of Air Age is the surface 5 cm away from human head. There is none standard about specifying the design domain and the adopted "5 cm" is instructed by other researches (Ojima 2009;Seo et al 2013;Zhang and You 2014).…”
Section: Design Objectives and Design Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a comfortable environment, the PMV and DR are recommended to be in the range of -0.5 < PMV < 0.5 and DR < 20% (ASHRAE 2004;ISO 2005). For the design domain, the PMV and DR are controlled on the surface 10 cm away from the human body and the sensitive bare body such as human head, shoulders and feet (Ojima 2009;Seo et al 2013;Zhang and You 2014).…”
Section: Design Objectives and Design Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the determination of thermal comfort, ASHRAE Standard 55 [4] has recommended the predicted mean vote (PMV) model, given by Fanger [5], as the standard method, as it considers all the variables affecting the comfort condition of the human beings. Based on the same method, several studies have been conducted that aim to assess the thermal comfort levels of the occupants in buildings [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] and also its dependency on the solar radiation [16], various physical parameters [17,18] as well as the number of occupants [19] within the study boundary. Thermal comfort conditions may vary from one individual to another.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%