2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2005.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical study on the influence of hydrogen addition on soot formation in a laminar ethylene–air diffusion flame

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
109
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
12
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been shown that hydrogen enrichment can improve flame stability and thus reduce NO x f o r m a t i o ni np r e m i x e dfl a m e s [1][2][3][4][5], as well as increase burning velocity [6][7][8]. For diffusion combustion, hydrogen enrichment can suppress the formation of soot particles [9,10] and shorten ignition delay [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that hydrogen enrichment can improve flame stability and thus reduce NO x f o r m a t i o ni np r e m i x e dfl a m e s [1][2][3][4][5], as well as increase burning velocity [6][7][8]. For diffusion combustion, hydrogen enrichment can suppress the formation of soot particles [9,10] and shorten ignition delay [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When syngas 1 fraction increased, the combustion temperature decreased owing to the significant content of inert components and incomplete combustion of H 2 and CO, which resulted in a decrease in soot oxidation rate. Meanwhile, the increase in syngas 1 fraction also caused a decrease in soot formation rate, since all components of syngas suppressed soot formation when mixed with hydrocarbon fuels due to the combined dilution and thermal effects [14][15][16]. When a small amount of diesel fuel was substituted with syngas 1, the decrease in soot oxidation rate was similar to or slightly more significant than the decrease in soot formation rate, which led to little change or a slight increase in soot emissions.…”
Section: Effect Of Syngas 1 Fraction On Engine Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, CO chemically promotes soot formation while H 2 chemically suppresses soot formation when they are mixed with other hydrocarbon fuels [14,16]. Although the dilution effect is usually much more significant than the chemical effect [14][15][16], the combined dilution and chemical effect of CO is less significant than that of H 2 in terms of decrease in soot formation rate. As a result, the substitution of diesel by syngas 5 caused less soot emissions than that of syngas 1, since the H 2 /CO ratio in syngas 5 was higher.…”
Section: Effect Of H 2 /Co Ratio On Energy Efficiency and Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it has been shown that fuel enrichment can improve flame stability and thus significantly reduce NO X formation by allowing a combustor to operate at leaner condition [1][2][3][4] in premixed flames. For diffusion combustion, fuel enrichment can suppress the formation of soot particles [5,6] and shorten ignition delay [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrogen was selected because it has been shown to be an effective enrichment component that can suppress soot formation in diffusion flames [5,6] and shorten ignition delay [7,8]. The fraction of hydrogen changed from 0 to 1.0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%