2006
DOI: 10.1002/pamm.200610368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Treatment of Second Order Differential‐Algebraic Systems

Abstract: We consider the numerical treatment of systems of second order differential-algebraic equations (DAEs). The classical approach of transforming a second order system to first order by introducing new variables can lead to difficulties such as an increase in the index or the loss of structure. We show how we can compute an equivalent strangeness-free second order system using the derivative array approach and we present Runge-Kutta methods for the direct numerical solution of second order DAEs.We discuss the num… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By using the algebraic approach, we have analyzed the solvability of second order SiDEs/descriptor systems, based on the derived condensed forms constructed under certain constant rank assumptions. In comparison to the previously known procedures [17,22], we have reduced the number of constant rank conditions in every index reduction step from seven to five. This would enlarge the domain of application for SiDEs (and also for DAEs).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By using the algebraic approach, we have analyzed the solvability of second order SiDEs/descriptor systems, based on the derived condensed forms constructed under certain constant rank assumptions. In comparison to the previously known procedures [17,22], we have reduced the number of constant rank conditions in every index reduction step from seven to five. This would enlarge the domain of application for SiDEs (and also for DAEs).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As have been fully discussed in [13,17] for continuous-time systems, these disadvantages include: (1st) increase the index of the singular system, and therefore the complexity of a numerical method to solve it; (2nd) increase the computational effort due to the bigger size of a new system; (3rd) affect the controllability/observability of the corresponding descriptor system since there exist situations where a new system is uncontrollable while the original one is. Therefore, the algebraic approach, which treats the system directly without reformulating it, has been presented in [13,17,22,23] in order to overcome the disadvantages mentioned above. Nevertheless, even for second order SiDEs, this method has not yet been considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We finish by mentioning that in [15,16] the given DAE is transformed via derivative arrays to a so-called strangeness-free mixed-order system which then can be handled by standard methods. Under additional quite special conditions, such a system is provided by evaluating involved matrix polynomials in [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since the standard way to obtain a strangeness-free first order formulation-first introducing new variables for the derivatives to transform the system into a first order system and then applying the usual index reduction procedures to the first order system-can fail due to a possible increase in the index, at first an index reduction of the higher order system should be used, which is followed by an appropriate order reduction to obtain a suitable strangeness-free first order formulation. Recently, it has been shown in [14,17] that also the direct discretization of the second order system may yield better numerical results and is able to prevent certain numerical difficulties as the failure of numerical methods; see also [1,2,16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%