2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2012.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical validation of shear flow corrections for beamforming acoustic source localisation in open wind-tunnels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No flow correction is taking into account due to the low velocity and small flow thickness. 39 Usually, the beamforming assumes a scan zone, where the sources are searched, in a plane parallel to the microphone array close to the profile. In this case, the scan zone is the profile to be more accurate.…”
Section: Acoustic Source Localization With a Microphone Arraymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No flow correction is taking into account due to the low velocity and small flow thickness. 39 Usually, the beamforming assumes a scan zone, where the sources are searched, in a plane parallel to the microphone array close to the profile. In this case, the scan zone is the profile to be more accurate.…”
Section: Acoustic Source Localization With a Microphone Arraymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consisting in numerical simulations relying on a Computational AeroAcoustics (CAA) approach, these studies made it possible, first, to evaluate and, then, to discriminate the diverse acoustic installation effects to be possibly induced by the facility components (e.g., mounting side plates, nozzle, collector plate) or features (e.g., confined jet vs. co-flow) onto airframe noise experiments that are usually conducted within QFF (3)(4)(5)(6). At the light of these studies, it appeared that, although they were rather modest compared to the reflection / diffraction effects inherited from the experimental apparatus, the refraction effects resulting from the facility jet flow might impact the noise propagation in a non-negligible way, for instance by altering importantly the acoustic phase -a thing that could question the application of array localization techniques within facility environments (7). Inter-noise 2014 Therefore, follow-on computations were recently achieved on the basis of these previous works, with the view of investigating more closely the sole refraction effects to be expected from the jet flow of typical anechoic facilities such as NASA's LaRC QFF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…differences in propagation time due to the acoustics waves travelling through the shear layer, were taken into account using an approximate method based on the analysis of Padois et al [29]. In that study, it was shown that for a monopole source located inside a shear layer, the delay-and-sum beamforming image will be shifted downstream by a distance x sh ¼ Mh, where M is the Mach number of the flow and h is the perpendicular distance from the source to the shear layer.…”
Section: Experimental Test Cases and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%