2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2203.14154
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NUNet: Deep Learning for Non-Uniform Super-Resolution of Turbulent Flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[10] proposed a local single-agent RL approach whereby the agent makes a decision for one randomly-selected element at each step. At training time, the global solution is updated every time a Other work at the intersection of FEM and deep learning include reinforcement learning for generating a fixed (nonadaptive) mesh [26], unsupervised clustering for marking and p-refinement [33], and supervised learning for target resolution prediction [23], error estimation [37], and mesh movement [30].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[10] proposed a local single-agent RL approach whereby the agent makes a decision for one randomly-selected element at each step. At training time, the global solution is updated every time a Other work at the intersection of FEM and deep learning include reinforcement learning for generating a fixed (nonadaptive) mesh [26], unsupervised clustering for marking and p-refinement [33], and supervised learning for target resolution prediction [23], error estimation [37], and mesh movement [30].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional methods for AMR rely on estimating local refinement indicators (e.g., local error [43]) and heuristic marking strategies (e.g., greedy error-based marking) [4,7]. Recent data-driven methods for mesh refinement apply supervised learning to learn a fast neural network estimator of the solution from a fixed dataset of pre-generated high-resolution solutions [23,37]. However, greedy strategies based on local information cannot produce an optimal sequence of anticipatory refinement decisions in general, as they do not have sufficient information about features that may occur at subsequent time steps, while supervised methods do not directly optimize a given long-term objective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, many surrogate modeling applications are usually designed for specific tasks and cannot easily be transferred to a more general built environment scenario (Fang et al 2019;Tian et al 2022). In other recent built environment studies, deep learning models have been applied together with CFD simulations to reconstruct high resolution flow fields starting from a low resolution input, either CFD data (Obiols-Sales et al 2022;Pourbagian and Ashrafizadeh 2022) or sensor measurements data (Wei and Ooka 2023). This technique is typically referred to as super-resolution, and different deep learning architectures were applied, including physics-informed networks (Wei and Ooka 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%