1984
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6198.1984.tb01136.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nurse Acuity Systems: CASH vs. GRASP (A Determination of Nurse Staff Requirements)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2005). Papers often referred to nursing intensity in terms of the amount of time required to provide patient care (Dale & Mable 1983, Schroeder et al. 1984, Adams & Duchene 1985, Adams & Johnson 1986, McNeal et al.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2005). Papers often referred to nursing intensity in terms of the amount of time required to provide patient care (Dale & Mable 1983, Schroeder et al. 1984, Adams & Duchene 1985, Adams & Johnson 1986, McNeal et al.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contributing to the debate concerning the use of patient acuity and task-oriented methods to evaluate nurse requirements, a comparative case study was carried out in three medical units examining the CASH method (developed by the Commission for Administration Services in Hospital) and the GRASP method (designed by the Grace Hospital in Morgantown), which showed that load forecasts can range from 5 to 20 % (Schroeder et al 1984). The authors concluded that the category system is preferable to the task-based method, which requires much more detailed information concerning patient activities.…”
Section: Timed-task/activity Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%