2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12960-017-0209-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nurses who work in rural and remote communities in Canada: a national survey

Abstract: BackgroundIn Canada, as in other parts of the world, there is geographic maldistribution of the nursing workforce, and insufficient attention is paid to the strengths and needs of those providing care in rural and remote settings. In order to inform workforce planning, a national study, Nursing Practice in Rural and Remote Canada II, was conducted with the rural and remote regulated nursing workforce (registered nurses, nurse practitioners, licensed or registered practical nurses, and registered psychiatric nu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
85
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
85
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The data used to analyse the factor structure of the JRIN and JDIN scales were from a nationwide cross‐sectional study, the Nature of Nursing Practice in Rural and Remote Canada II involving 3,822 registered nurses (RNs), nurse practitioners (NPs), licensed or registered practical nurses (LPNs) and registered psychiatric nurses (RPNs; MacLeod et al, ). The 27‐page national survey questionnaire included five main sections of individual, community, workplace, nursing practice and personal/professional well‐being and was designed to develop a better understanding of factors influencing the occupational outcomes for nurses in rural/remote communities across Canada (MacLeod et al, ). Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the demographic characteristics of the national level data for the JRIN and the JDIN factor analysis subsamples.…”
Section: Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data used to analyse the factor structure of the JRIN and JDIN scales were from a nationwide cross‐sectional study, the Nature of Nursing Practice in Rural and Remote Canada II involving 3,822 registered nurses (RNs), nurse practitioners (NPs), licensed or registered practical nurses (LPNs) and registered psychiatric nurses (RPNs; MacLeod et al, ). The 27‐page national survey questionnaire included five main sections of individual, community, workplace, nursing practice and personal/professional well‐being and was designed to develop a better understanding of factors influencing the occupational outcomes for nurses in rural/remote communities across Canada (MacLeod et al, ). Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the demographic characteristics of the national level data for the JRIN and the JDIN factor analysis subsamples.…”
Section: Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the crucial role nurses play in the delivery of health care in rural hospitals, research and health policy are often focussed on the issues of recruitment and retention of the medical workforce (Kenny & Duckett, ; MacLeod et al, ; Pearson, ). Whilst there is no denying the importance of medical services in rural areas, the recruitment and retention of nurses is crucial to solving the healthcare shortages in rural areas (Pearson, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the crucial role nurses play in the delivery of health care in rural hospitals, research and health policy are often focussed on the issues of recruitment and retention of the medical workforce (Kenny & Duckett, 2003;MacLeod et al, 2017;Pearson, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data used to test the proposed model were from a pan‐Canadian study “Nursing Practice in Rural and Remote Canada II” (RRNII) (MacLeod et al, ), with results reported according to the STROBE guidelines for cross‐sectional studies. The RRNII national survey questionnaire totalled 27 pages and consisted of five main sections of individual characteristics, work community, workplace, nursing practice and personal/professional well‐being.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The STROBE guidelines for cross-sectional research were followed in the design/reporting of this study (von Elm et al, 2008) (See Supporting Information File S1). Details on the full survey methodology are available elsewhere (MacLeod et al, 2017). See Table 1 for sample characteristics for the present analysis.…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 99%