Nutrient Leaching from Soil Amended with Manure and Compost from Cattle Fed Diets Containing Wheat Dried Distillers’ Grains with Solubles

Li, Ping; Lang, Man; Li, Chunli; Thomas, Ben W.; Hao, Xiying

doi:10.1007/s11270-016-3094-6

Cited by 17 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The one exception was for the manure type x manure rate interaction at 1.20 to 1.50 m depth, where concentration of WEOC was significantly greater for SM than CM at the 77 Mg ha -1 rate. This latter finding was consistent with Li et al (2016) who reported greater leaching of non-purgeable organic C in leachate from soil cores amended with fresh compared to composted beef feedlot manure.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Short-term legacy effects of feedlot manure amendments on water-extractable organic carbon in a clay loam soil profile

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Limited research exists on legacy effects of land application of feedlot manure on accumulation, redistribution, and leaching potential of water-extractable organic carbon (WEOC) in soil profiles. We sampled a clay loam soil at six depths (0–1.50 m) 2 yr after the last application (2014) of 17 continuous annual manure applications (since 1998). The amendment treatments were stockpiled (SM) or composted (CM) feedlot manure containing straw (ST) or wood-chip (WD) bedding at three application rates (13, 39, and 77 Mg ha−1 dry basis). There was also an unamended control (CON) and inorganic fertilizer (IN) treatment. The soil samples were analyzed for concentrations of WEOC. The total mass or accumulation of WEOC in the soil profile was greater (P ≤ 0.05) by 1.2–3.3 times for the CM-ST-77 treatment than 12 of 14 other treatments, and it was significantly greater for amended than CON or IN treatments. The total WEOC mass was 14%–20% greater for CM-ST than CM-WD, SM-ST, and SM-WD treatments, and it was 16%–22% greater for CM than SM at the 39 and 77 Mg ha−1 rates. The 77 Mg ha−1 rate of the four manure type-bedding treatments had the significantly greatest (by 37%–527%) concentrations of WEOC at the six depths compared with other treatments, suggesting greater redistribution and leaching potential. Significant manure effects occurred on soil WEOC 2 yr after the manure was last applied following 17 continuous applications, and it indicated an increased risk of leaching potential at the higher application rate.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Short-term legacy effects of feedlot manure amendments on water-extractable organic carbon in a clay loam soil profile

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Digestate had the lowest soil-test P risk, while cattle manure and pellets were similar, but separated solids had a 29% greater risk of soil-test P accumulation per unit of N applied than cattle manure, indicating that this amendment requires careful management to minimize soil-test P accumulation when applied at N-based rates. This is important because soil-test P is an indicator for loss via runoff and leaching pathways (Pote et al, 1996;Sims et al, 2000;Olson et al, 2010;Kumaragamage et al, 2011;Ziadi et al, 2013;Li et al, 2016). It also provides evidence that P-based rates may be more suitable for the higher risk amendments such as cattle manure and separated solids.…”

Section: Residual Nitrate-nitrogen and Soiltest Phosphorus Risk Factorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Anaerobically Digested Cattle Manure Supplied More Nitrogen with Less Phosphorus Accumulation than Undigested Manure

Thomas

Nelson

et al. 2017

Agronomy Journal

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Solid beef cattle manure is a good anaerobic digestion feedstock for methane production, but more research is needed to determine how co-products of the anaerobically digested manure may be used in crop production, while limiting the risk of nutrient loss to the environment. Over four growing seasons, we measured the N and P supplied to barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) forage test crops from (i) anaerobically digested solid beef cattle manure (digestate), (ii) separated solids from the digestate (separated solids), (iii) pelletized separated solids (pellets), and (iv) undigested solid beef cattle manure (manure) that were applied to target 1× (260 kg N ha -1 ) and 2× (520 kg N ha -1 ) the recommended N rates. Non-amended soil was the control. Digestate led to 31 to 50% greater barley forage yield than the other amendments. Th e apparent N recovery from digestate (19%) was much greater than pellets (2%) and about double that of the separated solids (9%) and cattle manure (10%). Th e barley N uptake derived from digestate was 41%, which was signifi cantly greater than manure (22%), separated solids (17%), and pellets (2%). Digestate increased P uptake, while signifi cantly reducing soil-test P accumulation compared with the other coproducts and cattle manure when applied at N-based rates. Our results confi rmed that management practices for solid beef cattle feedlot manure may be used for separated solids, but not digestate. Pelletized separated solids may be an eff ective slow release fertilizer, while also supplying C, but determination of its nutrient release patterns is required.

show abstract

“…After the first batch, the leaching quantities of phosphorus were in decline in each round and PCB released 2.68 μmol/g of PO 4 -P and 9.16 μmol/g of TP-P in total, while these values were 7.11 and 8.55 for HB, respectively. Compared to the compost (around 82 μmol/g of PO 4 -P in 6 rounds of leaching) [ 11 ] and poultry litter biochar (82.6–146.1 μmol/g of PO 4 -P in 10-days leaching) [ 15 ] in other studies, the phosphorus leaching quantities of PCB and HB were relatively low.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In recent studies, many natural and artificial materials have been investigated to determine their feasibility as filter additives in the filtration layer of bioretention facilities and they can be generally divided into three types: biological waste materials, mineral materials and biochar. Biological waste materials (e.g., coconut [ 9 ], peat [ 10 ] and livestock manure [ 11 ], etc.) still have high leaching quantities of phosphorus, due to the accumulation of a large number of nitrogen and phosphorus nutrients in the growth process, leading to the limitations of phosphorus removal.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Phosphorus Release and Adsorption Properties of Polyurethane–Biochar Crosslinked Material as a Filter Additive in Bioretention Systems

Meng

Wang

2021

Polymers

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bioretention systems are frequently employed in stormwater treatment to reduce phosphorus pollution and prevent eutrophication. To enhance their efficiency, filter additives are required but the currently used traditional materials cannot meet the primary requirements of excellent hydraulic properties as well as outstanding release and adsorption capacities at the same time. In this research, a polyurethane-biochar crosslinked material was produced by mixing the hardwood biochar (HB) with polyurethane to improve the performance of traditional filter additives. Through basic parameter tests, the saturated water content of polyurethane-biochar crosslinked material (PCB) was doubled and the permeability coefficient of PCB increased by two orders of magnitude. Due to the polyurethane, the leaching speed of phosphorus slowed down in the batching experiments and fewer metal cations leached. Moreover, PCB could adsorb 93–206 mg/kg PO43− at a typical PO43− concentration in stormwater runoff, 1.32–1.58 times more than HB, during isothermal adsorption experiments. In the simulating column experiments, weaker hydropower reduced the PO43− leaching quantities of PCB and had a stable removal rate of 93.84% in phosphate treatment. This study demonstrates the potential use of PCB as a filter additive in a bioretention system to achieve hydraulic goals and improve phosphate adsorption capacities.

show abstract

Nutrient Leaching from Soil Amended with Manure and Compost from Cattle Fed Diets Containing Wheat Dried Distillers’ Grains with Solubles

Cited by 17 publications

References 41 publications

Short-term legacy effects of feedlot manure amendments on water-extractable organic carbon in a clay loam soil profile

Short-term legacy effects of feedlot manure amendments on water-extractable organic carbon in a clay loam soil profile

Anaerobically Digested Cattle Manure Supplied More Nitrogen with Less Phosphorus Accumulation than Undigested Manure

Phosphorus Release and Adsorption Properties of Polyurethane–Biochar Crosslinked Material as a Filter Additive in Bioretention Systems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About