2016
DOI: 10.3390/w8040116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrient Retention in Restored Streams and Rivers: A Global Review and Synthesis

Abstract: Excess nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) from human activities have contributed to degradation of coastal waters globally. A growing body of work suggests that hydrologically restoring streams and rivers in agricultural and urban watersheds has potential to increase N and P retention, but rates and mechanisms have not yet been analyzed and compared across studies. We conducted a review of nutrient retention within hydrologically reconnected streams and rivers, including 79 studies. We developed a typology charac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
88
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
2
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies have documented the impacts of urban run‐off on stream water quality. Regional case studies highlight increased loading to receiving streams of pollutants such as nutrients (Newcomer Johnson, Kaushal, Mayer, Smith, & Sivirichi, ), suspended solids (MacAvoy, Plank, Mucha, & Williamson, ), oil and grease (Sood, Sood, Bansal, & John, ), faecal coliform bacteria (Paule‐Mercado et al, ), trace metals (Ruchter & Sures, ), thermal energy (Sun, Yearsley, Voisin, & Lettenmaier, ), and salts (Corsi, De Cicco, Lutz, & Hirsch, ). These studies indicate elevated but highly variable concentrations of solutes in streams with several constituents surpassing public health standards, stressing aquatic biota, and potentially impairing any beneficial use of water resources in these landscapes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have documented the impacts of urban run‐off on stream water quality. Regional case studies highlight increased loading to receiving streams of pollutants such as nutrients (Newcomer Johnson, Kaushal, Mayer, Smith, & Sivirichi, ), suspended solids (MacAvoy, Plank, Mucha, & Williamson, ), oil and grease (Sood, Sood, Bansal, & John, ), faecal coliform bacteria (Paule‐Mercado et al, ), trace metals (Ruchter & Sures, ), thermal energy (Sun, Yearsley, Voisin, & Lettenmaier, ), and salts (Corsi, De Cicco, Lutz, & Hirsch, ). These studies indicate elevated but highly variable concentrations of solutes in streams with several constituents surpassing public health standards, stressing aquatic biota, and potentially impairing any beneficial use of water resources in these landscapes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water 2016, 8,390 3 of 17 [31]. Approximately 61% of the watershed drains directly to storm drains and only 7.2% of the watershed is served by stormwater management [31].…”
Section: Site Descriptions and Sampling Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reducing nonpoint sources of P-rich sediments from urban and suburban watersheds via best management practices (BMPs) including various stormwater control measures (SCMs), and stream restoration designs [4][5][6][7][8], are among the top choices for restoration strategies in the Chesapeake Bay and other coastal watersheds [9][10][11]. Ignoring land costs, constructed wetlands and ponds were the least expensive to construct and maintain among the six stormwater SCMs investigated [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Managing the connectivity between fluvial hydrosystem units is becoming more widely recognized as an important tool in the protection and remediation of chemical contaminants in water resources (e.g., Newcomer‐Johnson et al. ).…”
Section: Physical and Chemical Connections As Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%