2019
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrient scarcity strengthens soil fauna control over leaf litter decomposition in tropical rainforests

Abstract: Soil fauna is a key control of the decomposition rate of leaf litter, yet its interactions with litter quality and the soil environment remain elusive. We conducted a litter decomposition experiment across different topographic levels within the landscape replicated in two rainforest sites providing natural gradients in soil fertility to test the hypothesis that low nutrient availability in litter and soil increases the strength of fauna control over litter decomposition. We crossed these data with a large dat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in contrast to our hypothesis and earlier observations by Cuevas and Medina (1988), in our experiment, fine roots did not affect total litter mass, nor C and N loss, but reduced the lignin fraction in the remaining litter, which may have led to an accelerated mass loss in later stages of decomposition. Excluding fine roots may have excluded soil meso-and likely some soil microfauna (Powers et al 2009;Peguero et al 2019), however, we did not find a significant impact on litter mass loss. Moreover, the lack of differences in mass loss rates suggests that the size of the litterbags did not influence the results.…”
Section: Fine Roots Do Not Accelerate Litter Mass Loss But Stimulate Nutrient Mobilizationcontrasting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in contrast to our hypothesis and earlier observations by Cuevas and Medina (1988), in our experiment, fine roots did not affect total litter mass, nor C and N loss, but reduced the lignin fraction in the remaining litter, which may have led to an accelerated mass loss in later stages of decomposition. Excluding fine roots may have excluded soil meso-and likely some soil microfauna (Powers et al 2009;Peguero et al 2019), however, we did not find a significant impact on litter mass loss. Moreover, the lack of differences in mass loss rates suggests that the size of the litterbags did not influence the results.…”
Section: Fine Roots Do Not Accelerate Litter Mass Loss But Stimulate Nutrient Mobilizationcontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…In tropical forests, litter decay and nutrient mineralization rates are generally fast due to hot and humid conditions, and are instead predominantly controlled by faunal litter fragmentation, litter stoichiometry and microbial decomposer activity (Cusack et al 2009;Powers et al 2009;Prescott 2010;Peguero et al 2019). The biochemical depolymerization of complex molecules (e.g., cellulose, lignin, chitin or proteins) to smaller units available for uptake by plants and microbes is catalyzed by a range of extracellular enzymes (Sinsabaugh et al 2002;Schimel and Bennett 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the production of biomass the next important process is decomposition ( Wilkinson 1998 ). Litter decomposition mainly depends on the complex relationships between different groups of soil fauna and microorganisms that inhabit agroecosystems as well as climate and litter quality ( Swift et al., 1979 ; Peguero et al., 2019 ). Soil fauna plays a key role in organic matter decomposition ( Brussaard 1997 ; Smith and Bradford 2003 ; Lavelle et al., 2006 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When accessible to macrodetritivores recalcitrant litter mass loss could equal or exceed labile litter mass loss. A number of species of millipedes, termites and woodlice have been shown to exhibit a preference for recalcitrant or nutrient poor litter qualities over labile litter (Hättenschwiler and Gasser 2005;Peguero et al 2019;Sitters et al 2014). As mentioned earlier, termites avoid readily digestible litterhigh sugar or labile fractionsdue to the fermentation process in termite guts (Abe et al 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several macrodetritivores, e.g. millipedes, termites and woodlice, prefer recalcitrant litter types (Hättenschwiler and Gasser 2005;Peguero et al 2019;Sitters et al 2014). For example, termite species ferment litter within the gut through a mutualistic relationship with microorganisms (i.e.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%