2019
DOI: 10.1080/01904167.2019.1609510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrition of fig (Ficus carica L.) under hydroponics and greenhouse conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are few studies on the mineral content in different vegetative parts of the fig tree in which differences can be found in the concentrations of the aforementioned elements in several fig tree cultivars. ("Calimyrna" [38], "Pellejo duro" [39], "Conadria" [40], and "Nezahualcóyotl" [41]), so it's difficult to select reference values. However, in most cases, macro and micronutrient concentrations similar to those found in the present investigation were reported.…”
Section: Mineral Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are few studies on the mineral content in different vegetative parts of the fig tree in which differences can be found in the concentrations of the aforementioned elements in several fig tree cultivars. ("Calimyrna" [38], "Pellejo duro" [39], "Conadria" [40], and "Nezahualcóyotl" [41]), so it's difficult to select reference values. However, in most cases, macro and micronutrient concentrations similar to those found in the present investigation were reported.…”
Section: Mineral Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig species typically have a higher P demand than do other tropical plants (Fig. 2b–d), with research showing fig species having a relatively high leaf P mass content (2–4 mg g −1 ) and relatively low leaf N : P ratios (6–11) under nutrient‐sufficient conditions (Xiang & Chen, 2004; Leonel & Damatto, 2008; Garrish et al ., 2010; Mendoza‐Castillo et al ., 2019). Most of our study's corresponding values were within those ranges: respectively, 2.5 mg g −1 and 8.9 for nonhemiepiphytic F. tinctoria ; 2.3 mg g −1 and 9.6 for epiphytic F. tinctoria ; and 2.0 mg g −1 and 11.1 for free‐standing hemiepiphytic F. tinctoria ; however, the 1.8 mg g −1 and 12.3 for transitional F. tinctoria were outside both ranges.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it is generally difficult to control and measure the absorption of mineral nutrients under soil cultivation, hydroponics systems are widely used [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. These systems allow easy nutrient solution management and optimal supply of mineral elements in soluble form [20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%