2008
DOI: 10.1177/0884533608321131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrition Screening vs Nutrition Assessment: How Do They Differ?

Abstract: Interest in nutrition screening has increased rapidly due to regulatory requirements as well as the known adverse impact of nutrition deficits on outcomes of hospitalization. Screening programs now in use in acute care are often complex and difficult to administer. Current interest in evaluation of all aspects of healthcare using evidence-based methods requires that nutrition screening programs be thoroughly evaluated. Clinicians attempting to evaluate evidence in support of different methods to identify patie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
64
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
64
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather, a more relevant role for nurses would be the identification of patients at nutrition risk. Nutrition risk screening involves asking validated, simple questions to determine whether a more detailed nutrition assessment is needed 17 . Screening tests are typically designed to be more sensitive than specific, and a negative screen means that nutrition compromise is unlikely and further detailed nutrition assessment unnecessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, a more relevant role for nurses would be the identification of patients at nutrition risk. Nutrition risk screening involves asking validated, simple questions to determine whether a more detailed nutrition assessment is needed 17 . Screening tests are typically designed to be more sensitive than specific, and a negative screen means that nutrition compromise is unlikely and further detailed nutrition assessment unnecessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Charney (25) emphasizes the lack of agreement on the definition of nutritional screening between international nutrition societies such as the ADA (American Diabetes Association), ASPEN (American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition) and ESPEN. For this reason there is no standard reference tool for nutritional screening and/or assessment (15,23,26,27) and given the heterogeneity of the population and that hospital malnutrition is a dynamic continuum (25,28), a standard reference tool was not put into place in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason there is no standard reference tool for nutritional screening and/or assessment (15,23,26,27) and given the heterogeneity of the population and that hospital malnutrition is a dynamic continuum (25,28), a standard reference tool was not put into place in this study. Another finding from the study is that nutritional screening or assessment should be part of the …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, one of the criteria for dietitians to consider in assessing nutritional status is BMI and this may have confounded results; however we are not sure to what extent BMI was considered as a factor in assessing nutritional status by the dietitian as each determination was based on subjective clinical judgment. In institutional settings, RDs typically assess nutritional status using several indicators including serum albumin and BMI 29, 32, 33…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%