2008
DOI: 10.3793/jaam.5.39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutritional Education and Exercise Treatment Based on Cognitive Behavioral Treatment in the Saku Control Obesity Program (SCOP)

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Long-term weight loss is difficult to maintain, but recently cognitive behavioral therapy has been shown to be effective for long-term weight loss and maintenance. METHODS:The 119 participants, who had been assigned to program to lose weight, were interviewed by dieticians regarding their motivation for weight loss and psychological status and self-corrected problems with their eating activities and exercises, following recognition of problems, discussing solutions, and devising personal dietary pl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the intervention, energy source, crops and diary decreased, while the intake of green yellow vegetables increased. 27 Eating speed improved and physical activity also increased compared to the control group. 32 Especially in Group A, women increased their daily physical activity and improved their irregular eating habits during the follow-up period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…During the intervention, energy source, crops and diary decreased, while the intake of green yellow vegetables increased. 27 Eating speed improved and physical activity also increased compared to the control group. 32 Especially in Group A, women increased their daily physical activity and improved their irregular eating habits during the follow-up period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The integrative interventions have been reported in detail previously. [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] Group A participants were followed for two years after one year intervention, without any period. Clinical and biological parameters were assessed at baseline (0 month), after the end of intervention (12 month) and during the follow-up (24 month) ( Figure 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation