1990
DOI: 10.1079/nrr19900014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutritional Regulation of Gastric Secretion, Digestion and Emptying

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 132 publications
1
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4A). No other macronutrients were included because we aimed to assess the postprandial response of different amounts of whey protein without possible confounding effects of carbohydrate and/or fat intake on protein digestion and absorption kinetics (10,17). Consequently, nonisocaloric protein drinks were compared, and, as a result, different insulin responses were observed between experiments (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4A). No other macronutrients were included because we aimed to assess the postprandial response of different amounts of whey protein without possible confounding effects of carbohydrate and/or fat intake on protein digestion and absorption kinetics (10,17). Consequently, nonisocaloric protein drinks were compared, and, as a result, different insulin responses were observed between experiments (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complex interactions between myogenic, neural and hormonal mechanisms determine the rate 244 of gastric emptying and are associated with meal volume and content (Low, 1990 (Wright et al, 1998). However, when using non-disintegrating radio-opaque 254 pellets faster gastric emptying was observed in suckling piglets (PND21) compared to recently 255 weaned piglets (Snoeck et al, 2004).…”
Section: Gastrointestinal Transit 243mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Viscosity induces changes in the rheological properties of digestive contents. This, in turn, can result in a reduced gastric emptying rate, although this is controversed for the solid phase [18], modified transit and motility in the small intestine [6], and reduced movement of nutrients from the lumen to the mucosal epithelium [12]. All these effects can result in slower or reduced intestinal absorption.…”
Section: Glucose Absorption Balance Across the Small Intestinementioning
confidence: 99%