2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2011.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Object–Action Complexes: Grounded abstractions of sensory–motor processes

Abstract: This paper formalises Object-Action Complexes (OACs) as a basis for symbolic representations of sensorimotor experience and behaviours. OACs are designed to capture the interaction between objects and associated actions in artificial cognitive systems. This paper gives a formal definition of OACs, provides examples of their use for autonomous cognitive robots, and enumerates a number of critical learning problems in terms of OACs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
88
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To verify if the entropy-based action selection policy (MinEnt) improves classification, we compare this policy where the action is given by (8) to randomly selected actions (Random). Since the dataset is limited in number of samples, we proceed by bootstrapping, instead of having two separate training and test sets.…”
Section: Classification With Optimal Action Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To verify if the entropy-based action selection policy (MinEnt) improves classification, we compare this policy where the action is given by (8) to randomly selected actions (Random). Since the dataset is limited in number of samples, we proceed by bootstrapping, instead of having two separate training and test sets.…”
Section: Classification With Optimal Action Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A parallel can be drawn to Object-Action Complexes (OACs) [8]. OACs have been proposed as bricks for cognitive architectures and are formalized to include an object and …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The action was associated with the symbolic name given to the action. Transferring the knowledge to a high-level cognitive system could also be achieved with a symbolic representation that captured the interaction between objects and actions [31,32]. However, in the present study, we assumed that the teacher supplied the name of the action that he executed for the robot.…”
Section: Robot Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a successful integration of these techniques in a robotic platform, it is mandatory to ground the symbolic descriptions of the AI planning methods to let the robot interact with the real world in order to execute a task [12]. This is normally done by integrating methods of different levels of abstractions [10,13,14,15,16], ranging from purely symbolic methods [17], to sensor information processing [18] and acting methods [19]. Several approaches integrate planning and acting for the robotic execution of human like tasks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%