1971
DOI: 10.3758/bf03335950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Object-discrimination learning set and hypothesis behavior in the northern bluejay (Cynaocitta cristata)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
20
2

Year Published

1973
1973
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
20
2
Order By: Relevance
“…First of all, these results replicate a number of previous findings involving ODLS in bluejays. ODLS formation was again obtained, although at a faster rate in terms of number of problems, than that reported by Hunter and Kamil (1971). This difference in rate is probably due to the criterion procedure used to terminate individual problems in the current experiment.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 40%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First of all, these results replicate a number of previous findings involving ODLS in bluejays. ODLS formation was again obtained, although at a faster rate in terms of number of problems, than that reported by Hunter and Kamil (1971). This difference in rate is probably due to the criterion procedure used to terminate individual problems in the current experiment.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 40%
“…This difference in rate is probably due to the criterion procedure used to terminate individual problems in the current experiment. Hunter and Kamil (1971) employed a fixed number of trials procedure. The retention performance of the bluejays in this experiment, during Blocks 2 and 3, is very similar to that reported by Kamil et a1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, although the crows were able to solve individual object discrimination problems, they showed minimal ODLS acquisition. These performance levels are considerably lower than those previously obtained with either bluejays (Hunter & Kamil, 1971) or myna birds (Kamil & Hunter, 1970).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…A large literature describes differences between the skills used by human experts and novices (e.g., mathematics and physics -Chi, Feltovitch, & Glaser, 1981;chess-Simon & Chase, 1973; serial memory- Chase & Ericsson, 1981;and medicine-Lesgold et al, 1988). By contrast, the literature on animal expertise is limited to a small number of experiments showing how monkeys (Harlow, 1949), rats (Eichenbaum, Fagan, & Cohen, 1986), and korvids (Hunter & Kamil, 1971) "learn to learn" a simple rule for discriminating two novel objects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%